King & Spalding Wants Part Of $4.6M Malpractice Deal Secret

By Kat Greene · January 28, 2016, 10:40 PM EST

King & Spalding LLP asked a California federal judge on Thursday to keep under wraps some of the terms of a proposed $4.6 million deal in a suit accusing the firm...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Memorandum in Support of Motion

Case Information

Case Title

James Estakhrian v. Mark Obenstine et al

Case Number

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Contract: Other

Date Filed

April 22, 2011

Recent Articles By Kat

September 17, 2024
Chrisley Sentence Should Stick Despite 11th Circ., Feds Argue
September 10, 2024
Ariz. Gov. Can Join Monument Suit, Tribes and Enviros Sit Out
July 17, 2018
Manafort Can't Move Fraud Trial To Roanoke, Judge Rules
July 11, 2018
Kavanaugh Splurged On Baseball Tix, Reports Say
July 10, 2018
Calif. Must Pay Back $331M To Mortgage Settlement Fund
July 05, 2018
NY Property Owners Win Cert. In Chemical Exposure Suit
June 28, 2018
Why The Defense Bar Celebrates Kennedy
June 27, 2018
'Goodbye, Tony!' Justices Bid Farewell To Kennedy
June 20, 2018
Wilmington Bank Can Keep Attorney In Insurance Row: Judge
April 30, 2018
BNSF Pushes For Appeal In Wash. Tribe's Right-Of-Way Suit