King & Spalding's $4.6M Malpractice Deal Gets Initial OK

By Kali Hays · February 16, 2016, 6:28 PM EST

A California federal judge on Tuesday gave initial support to a $4.6 million deal between King & Spalding LLP and a proposed class of investors accusing the firm of malpractice by...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Order

Case Information

Case Title

James Estakhrian v. Mark Obenstine et al

Case Number

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Contract: Other

Date Filed

April 22, 2011

Recent Articles By Kali

January 12, 2017
KWM Real Estate Outpost Grabbed As Administration Looms
November 29, 2016
Ex-Patton Boggs Atty Wants $1M In Ch. 7 Malpractice Case
October 27, 2016
ICSID Says Costa Rica Investors' Seizure Claims Too Late
October 25, 2016
BuckleySandler Nabs Ex-Fifth Third GC For Banking Practice
October 14, 2016
Feds Drop Mail Fraud Charges In Calif. Bid-Rigging Case
October 13, 2016
Atty Objects To $35K Sanctions In King & Spalding Condo Suit
October 07, 2016
Texas Firm Can't Nix New Claims In Debt Collection Suit
October 07, 2016
Empire Trustee's Adversary Suit Headed To Bankruptcy Court
October 05, 2016
Real Estate Agent Charged In Plot To Kill Attorney
September 27, 2016
Atty Faces Sanctions In King & Spalding Condo Suit