'Commencing' Is Ambiguous In Insurer's Policy, Judge Says

By Jeff Sistrunk · October 14, 2016, 7:33 PM EDT

An Illinois federal judge held in a precedential ruling Friday that an Acuity policy's condition that property damage is covered "commencing" during the policy period is ambiguous and may be interpreted...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Order

Case Information

Case Title

Temperature Service Company Inc. et al v. Acuity

Case Number

Court

Illinois Northern

Nature of Suit

110(Contract: Insurance)

Date Filed

February 16, 2016

Recent Articles By Jeff

January 22, 2021
Fla. Justices Close Extra Damages Avenue For Policyholders
January 21, 2021
Fla. Justices Nix Apartment Building Owners' Lost Rent Claim
November 18, 2020
Title Insurance Agent Denied Coverage Of Email Scam Loss
October 07, 2020
Chubb Unit Denied Appraisal Of Chocolatier's Sandy Claim
September 08, 2020
Insurer Asks Fla. Justices To Ax Apt. Owners' Lost Rent Claim
September 04, 2020
Fla. Justices Set To Tackle Citizens' Delay Damages Clash
August 27, 2020
Building Manager's Insurer Must Cover $2M Punitive Award
August 27, 2020
Contractor's Insurer Must Defend In Injury Suit, 7th Circ. Says
August 12, 2020
Mo. Restaurants Can Pursue COVID-19 Coverage Suit
August 11, 2020
Builder's $3M Deal In Worker Death Not Covered, 9th Circ. Told