In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
4:11-cv-06714
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Alioto Law Firm
- A&O Shearman
- Bartko LLP
- Berman Tabacco
- Cravath Swaine
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Dentons
- Faegre Drinker
- Fox Rothschild
- Gibson Dunn
- Goodwin Procter
- Hagens Berman
- Hueston Hennigan
- Kaufhold Gaskin
- Kellogg Hansen
- Kendall Brill & Kelly
- King & Spalding
- Kwun Bhansali
- Latham & Watkins
- Law Offices of Lawrence G. Papale
- Maddin Hauser
- Massumi & Consoli
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Munger Tolles
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Orrick Herrington
- Paul Hastings
- Perkins Coie
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Quinn Emanuel
- Saveri & Saveri
- Sheppard Mullin
- Skadden Arps
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Walker Stevens
- Weil Gotshal
- White & Case
- Willkie Farr
- Wilson Sonsini
- Winston & Strawn
- Wolf Haldenstein
Companies
- A&E Television Networks LLC
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Epic Games Inc.
- Google LLC
- Match Group LLC
- Meta Platforms Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- Playtika Ltd.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Showtime Networks Inc.
- Skype Technologies SA
- Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Starz LLC
- Valve Corp.
- Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 01, 2023
App-Store Users Slam Apple's 'Stubborn' Class Cert. Fight
Consumers accusing Apple of monopolizing app distribution fired back in California federal court against Apple's claim that their latest class certification bid could include millions of consumers who haven't been injured, arguing that it's possible to identify and cut those members from the class despite Apple's "stubborn insistence" otherwise.
-
March 13, 2023
Apple Fights Renewed App Store Antitrust Class Cert. Bid
Apple urged a California federal court to reject a renewed class certification bid from consumers accusing the company of monopolizing app distribution on its devices, arguing that the proposed class would include millions of members that suffered no harm.
-
January 23, 2023
Apple Makes Bid To Toss French App Developers' Antitrust Suit
Apple Inc. has asked a California federal judge to dismiss a bid from French app developers hoping to join ongoing antitrust litigation accusing the tech giant of charging developers supracompetitive fees to sell their apps on its platform, insisting the developers waited too long to bring about "copycat claims."
-
January 02, 2023
Antitrust Conduct Issues And Cases To Watch In 2023
The Federal Trade Commission prepares to test the limits of its authority to combat unfair methods of competition in the coming year, as the U.S. Department of Justice and state enforcers continue pushing aggressive antitrust agendas alongside new proposed class actions from private parties.
-
September 27, 2022
Apple App Store Users Renew Antitrust Class Cert. Bid
A proposed class of Apple App Store buyers has renewed their bid for certification in a suit accusing Apple Inc. of violating antitrust law through its store policies and commissions collected on app purchases.
-
August 22, 2022
French App Developers Ask To Join Apple Calif. Antitrust Suit
French app developers have asked a California federal court to add their case to an ongoing $10 billion antitrust litigation against Apple by a proposed class of consumers accusing the tech giant of charging developers supracompetitive fees to sell their apps on Apple's platform.
-
March 29, 2022
Apple App Store Users Denied Class Cert. In Antitrust Suit
A California federal judge on Tuesday refused to certify a class of Apple App Store users in $10 billion antitrust litigation against Apple, ruling that while the consumers satisfy most requirements for certification, there are lingering issues that need to be resolved.
-
November 16, 2021
Apple App Store Users Seek Cert. In $10B Antitrust Suit
Apple App Store users urged a California federal judge during a hearing Tuesday to grant class certification in their antitrust lawsuit alleging Apple foreclosed competition on its App Store, telling the judge that their expert estimates U.S. Apple consumers suffered $7 billion to $10 billion in damages as a result.
-
November 09, 2021
IPhone Buyers Can't Follow In Epic's Footsteps, Judge Says
A California federal judge refused to allow iPhone buyers to amend their monopolization claims against Apple to add allegations under California's unfair competition law, which Epic used to score a win against the phone giant in September.
-
October 28, 2021
Apple Says Consumers Trying To 'Rehab' Expert's Testimony
Apple wants a California federal judge to block iOS consumers from amending a key expert's deposition transcript, arguing the proposed tweaks represent an effort to "undo unhelpful admissions" that hurt their chances at class certification on monopolization claims.