November 18, 2013
IN RE: FANNIE MAE/FREDDIE MAC SENIOR PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT CLASS ACTION LITIGATIONS
Case Number:
1:13-mc-01288
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Derivative Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Bancroft PLLC
- Bernstein Litowitz
- Boies Schiller
- Covington & Burling
- Dhillon Law Group
- Foley & Lardner
- Glancy Prongay
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Guttman Buschner
- Kessler Topaz
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Mehri & Skalet
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Pomerantz LLP
- Seltzer Caplan
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 14, 2025
Fannie, Freddie Can't Avoid $612M Investor Win, Judge Rules
A D.C. federal judge on Friday upheld a $612.4 million jury verdict against the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, ruling that the jury was provided with "ample evidence" that reasonably led to its conclusion that FHFA improperly amended stock purchase agreements related to the companies.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login