Arnold et al v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation et al
Case Number:
4:16-cv-01345
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Akin Gump
- Crowe & Dunlevy
- Dechert LLP
- Griffin Dawsey
- Hangley Aronchick
- McQuaide Blasko
- Morgan Lewis
- Myers Brier
- Vinson & Elkins
Companies
- Anadarko Petroleum Corp.
- Chesapeake Energy Corp.
- Occidental Petroleum Corp.
- The Williams Cos. Inc.
- Williams Partners LP
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 05, 2018
Pa. Shale Landowners Want Arbitration Ruling Revisited
More than 600 Marcellus Shale landowners asked a Pennsylvania federal court Thursday to reconsider its refusal to permit "class" arbitration in their gas royalties fight with Chesapeake Energy Corp. and others, arguing they want their individual claims arbitrated together, not as a class.
-
June 08, 2017
Landowners Fight Gas Cos. Royalty Suit Arbitration Request
A group of Marcellus Shale landowners asked a Pennsylvania federal court on Wednesday to deny requests by Chesapeake Energy Corp., Anadarko Energy and others to force individual arbitration in a series of lawsuits alleging that the companies engaged in a monopolistic scheme to improperly deduct royalty payments.
-
May 02, 2017
Gas Cos. Want Arbitration For Pa. Shale Royalty Suits
A group of oil and gas companies including Chesapeake Energy Corp. and Anadarko Energy argued in a flurry of filings in Pennsylvania federal court Monday that a series of lawsuits in which hundreds of Marcellus Shale landowners alleged a monopolistic scheme to improperly deduct royalties belong in individual arbitration.
-
July 05, 2016
Chesapeake, Anadarko Staked Out Marcellus, RICO Suit Says
More than 400 landowners have hit Chesapeake Energy Corp., Anadarko Energy and other oil and gas companies with lawsuits in Pennsylvania federal court alleging they conspired to monopolize mineral rights within the Marcellus Shale region, and to defraud landholders by taking bogus deductions from their royalty checks, in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.