Melanie Glasser v. Hilton Grand Vacations Company

  1. July 10, 2020

    The Top Cybersecurity And Privacy Rulings So Far In 2020

    From a Maryland federal judge recognizing the value of personal data in today's economy to a Virginia court sending companies scrambling to keep post-data breach discussions secret, it's been a busy few months in cybersecurity and privacy litigation. Here are five rulings worth revisiting as we head into the year's second half.

  2. February 18, 2020

    11th Circ. Pressed To Reconsider Shrinking TCPA's Reach

    A consumer who lost her appeal alleging Hilton Grand Vacations violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act with millions of automated telemarketing calls asked the Eleventh Circuit to reconsider the ruling, arguing in a brief last week that the decision bucks Congress' intent.

  3. January 29, 2020

    Autodialer Ruling Will Reduce TCPA Flood In 11th Circ.

    The Eleventh Circuit will no longer be a top destination for robocall class actions, now that the appellate court has cemented a circuit split by dealing a fatal blow to plaintiffs' efforts to broadly define what counts as an autodialer.

  4. January 28, 2020

    11th Circ. Deepens Autodialer Split With New Robocall Ruling

    The Eleventh Circuit has refused to find that Hilton Grand Vacations used an autodialer to bombard consumers with unwanted robocalls, further deepening the divide over the scope of the disputed term under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

  5. July 12, 2019

    11th Circ. Urged To Revive Robocall Suit Against Hilton

    A consumer pushed the Eleventh Circuit on Thursday to reverse the axing of her proposed class action accusing Hilton Grand Vacations of violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by assailing consumers with unwanted robocalls, saying it was clear the calls were automated.

  6. April 05, 2019

    Hilton Says Autodialer Not At Play In 11th Circ. Robocall Case

    Hilton Grand Vacations is urging the Eleventh Circuit not to revive a proposed class action accusing it of bombarding consumers with unwanted robocalls, arguing that the equipment used to place the offending calls lacks the necessary features to be considered an autodialer.