Y.Y.G.M. SA v. Redbubble, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

21-56236

Court:

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit:

3840 Trademark

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. October 25, 2023

    9th Circ. Won't Rethink Redbubble TM Decisions

    The Ninth Circuit won't reverse a panel's unfavorable rulings for Atari and fashion retailer Brandy Melville in separate cases accusing print-on-demand marketplace Redbubble of fostering rampant trademark infringement.

  2. July 24, 2023

    Liability For User Infringement Begs Specificity, 9th Circ. Says

    Online marketplaces like Redbubble are liable for user-submitted trademark infringement only when they have specific knowledge of the infringement, the Ninth Circuit ruled Monday, telling a California federal judge to take a fresh look at fashion retailer Brandy Melville's case against the print-on-demand marketplace.

  3. January 12, 2023

    Atari, Brandy Melville Ask 9th Circ. To Nix Redbubble IP Wins

    Atari and fashion retailer Brandy Melville urged a Ninth Circuit panel to reverse unfavorable trial court rulings in separate cases accusing print-on-demand marketplace Redbubble of fostering rampant trademark infringement, arguing that the cases, which were litigated before separate trial judges, led to inconsistent and contradictory findings on contributory infringement.

  4. January 05, 2023

    IP Forecast: Big Tech's Fintiv Fight Heads To Fed. Circ.

    The Federal Circuit will hear arguments from some of the biggest names in the tech field that Patent Trial and Appeal Board judges don't have the power to reject patent challenges based on co-pending infringement suits in federal courts. Here's a look at that case — plus all the other major intellectual property matters on deck in the coming week.

  5. March 29, 2022

    9th Circ. Told To Revive TM Win Over Redbubble

    Fashion retailer Brandy Melville is urging the Ninth Circuit to overturn a ruling that slashed to $220,000 its $520,000 trademark win against print-on-demand marketplace Redbubble, saying the lower court wrongly focused on comparing the companies' products instead of their trademarks.