Anaclerio v. Dutra Group et al

Track this case

Case Number:

3:23-cv-04717

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Laurel Beeler

Firms

  1. August 16, 2024

    Calif. Forecast: Liberty Mutual $3M Deal Up For Approval

    In the coming week, attorneys should keep an eye out for potential final approval of a $3.125 million settlement in a wage and hour class action against Liberty Mutual. Here's a look at that case and other labor and employment matters coming up in California.

  2. June 21, 2024

    Calif. Forecast: Concentra Fights Cert. Of 350K Job Seekers

    In the coming week, attorneys should keep an eye out for potential class certification and expert disqualification in a suit against Concentra regarding medical inquiries for job applicants. Here's a look at that case and other labor and employment matters on deck in California.

  3. April 08, 2024

    Marine Co. Beats Ex-Worker's Wage Row, For Now

    A civil marine contractor successfully convinced a California federal judge to toss an ex-worker's wage and hour proposed class action for lack of evidence, but the judge left the door open for the worker to refile the suit.

  4. March 29, 2024

    Calif. Forecast: 9th Circ. Takes On Ministerial Exception

    In the coming two weeks, attorneys should watch for Ninth Circuit oral arguments in a pair of cases involving the ministerial exception. Here's a look at those cases and other labor and employment matters coming up in California.

  5. December 15, 2023

    Calif. Forecast: Starbucks, Managers Seek Wage Deal Sign-Off

    In the coming week, attorneys should keep an eye out for potential settlement approval in a proposed wage and hour class action against Starbucks. Here's a look at that case and other labor and employment matters on deck in California.

  6. November 30, 2023

    Marine Co. Pushes To Keep Wage Fight Out Of State Court

    A civil marine contractor urged a California federal judge not to remand a former worker's proposed wage and hour class action to state court, contending that federal labor law preempts the case since review of a collective bargaining agreement is necessary to resolve the claims.