Nick Feliciano, Petitioner v. Department of Transportation

  1. December 09, 2024

    Roberts Questions Gov't View On Reservist Top-Up Pay Law

    U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Monday pressed the federal government to explain why federally employed military reservists called to duty during emergencies aren't always owed top-up payments, suggesting it made a strained interpretation of differential pay law.

  2. December 07, 2024

    Up Next: Environmental Reviews, Wire Fraud & TM Awards

    The U.S. Supreme Court will hear its final set of oral arguments for the 2024 calendar year starting Monday, including disputes over the proper scope of federal environmental reviews and whether corporate affiliates can be ordered to pay disgorgement awards in trademark infringement disputes.

  3. October 29, 2024

    Military Reservist Not Exempt From Extra Pay, Justices Told

    Military reservists are owed top-up pay if they're called to serve during a war or national emergency, regardless of whether they're directly serving in those events, a U.S. Coast Guard reservist told the U.S. Supreme Court.

  4. September 30, 2024

    Military Reservist Not Owed Top-Up Pay, Feds Tell High Court

    A federal employee who was denied top-up pay while on active duty as a military reservist is not owed any wages because he wasn't called to serve in a national emergency despite serving at the same time as one, the U.S. Department of Transportation told the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday.

  5. August 19, 2024

    Military Reservist Tells High Court Top-Up Pay Law Is Broad

    A federal employee who was denied top-up pay while on active duty as a military reservist urged the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to rule that all federally employed reservists are owed differential pay if serving during a national emergency, regardless of the circumstances.

  6. June 24, 2024

    Justices Will Hear Reservist's Case Over Denied Top-Up Pay

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said it will hear a federal employee's case over whether he was owed differential pay after being called to active duty in his role as a military reservist, but not directly into a contingency operation.