Bias Accuser Can't Dodge Costly Arbitration, E&Y Argues

By Braden Campbell · August 28, 2019, 2:51 PM EDT

The former Ernst & Young real estate bigwig accusing the firm of firing her because she complained about sexism has agreed to let an arbitration panel decide how to divide legal...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Motion

Case Information

Case Title

Ward v. Ernst & Young U.S. LLP

Case Number

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Contract: Other

Date Filed

July 17, 2019

Recent Articles By Braden

September 23, 2022
Developers Can't Block Philly Project Labor Deal
July 11, 2022
Unions Eye Clean Energy Industry As Organizing Target
June 23, 2021
3 Takeaways From Justices' Union Farm Access Ruling
June 30, 2020
DC Circ. Says Cushman & Wakefield CEO Can't Duck Bias Suit
October 31, 2019
WeWork, Ex-CEO Biased Vs. Pregnant Women, EEOC Told
July 17, 2019
Ex-Worker Says EY Sex Bias Arbitration Costing Her $185K
January 07, 2019
ABM To Pay $5.4M Over Required Worker Cellphone Use
December 20, 2018
Invalid PAGA Waiver Dooms PennyMac's OT Arbitration Bid
September 26, 2018
Ex-Cushman Exec Hits Firm With $30M Race, Sex Bias Suit
September 24, 2018
Outgoing EY Partner Accuses Firm Of Sexism In EEOC Charge