Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stanford International Bank Ltd et al
Case Number:
3:09-cv-00298
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Securities/Commodities/Exchange
Judge:
Firms
- Sayles Law Firm
- Castillo Snyder
- Koning Rubarts
- Gray Reed
- Sheils Winnubst
- Friedman & Feiger
- Figari & Davenport
- Kuckelman Torline
- Spencer Fane
- Carrington Coleman
- Frost Brown
- Lynn Pinker
- Fishman Jackson
- Dilworth Paxson
- Brunini Grantham
- Boies Schiller
- Edmundson Shelton
- Thompson & Horton
- Pachulski Stang
- Glast Phillips
- Clyde Snow
- Green Light Law Group
- Pulman Cappuccio
- Parsons Behle
- McGinnis Lochridge
- Dykema
- Passman & Jones
- Perdue & Kidd
- Durio McGoffin
- Waddell Serafino
- Kilpatrick Townsend
- Hunton Andrews
- Hankinson LLP
- King & Spalding
- Sidley Austin
- Sommerman McCaffity
- Sheppard Mullin
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Skadden Arps
- Ferguson Braswell
- Kramer Levin
- Hedrick Kring
- Copeland Cook
- Bradley Arant
- Spence Desenberg
- Greenberg Traurig
- Meadows Collier
- MehaffyWeber
- Powers Taylor
- Preis Gordon
- Jack Nelson
- McGuireWoods
- Cowles & Thompson
- Blaies & Hightower
- Sequor Law
- Stinson LLP
- Touchstone Bernays
- Morgan Lewis
- Polsinelli PC
- Scott Hirsch Law Group
- Newland & Associates
- Christian Attar LLC
- Winstead PC
- Porter Hedges
- Akin Gump
- Troutman
- Chasnoff Stribling
- Wilson Elser
- Malouf & Nockels
- Bracewell LLP
- Wade Law Firm PC
- Gentry Locke
- Brown Fox PLLC
- Walker Wilcox
- Hayward & Associates PLLC
- Holland & Knight
- Blank Rome
- DLA Piper
- Barrera Firm
- Butzel Long
- Davis Polk
- Dentons
- Ballard Spahr
- FisherBroyles
- Criden & Love
- George Brothers
- Hoge & Gameros
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Rogers & Moore
- Krage & Janvey
- Davis & Santos
- Wiles & Wiles
- Baker Botts
- Kane Russell
- Homer Bonner
- Quilling Selander
- Streusand Landon
- Foley & Lardner
- Durham Pittard
- Nixon Peabody
- Munsch Hardt
- Johnston Clem
- Weil Gotshal
- Tillotson Johnson
- Terry Bryant Accident & Injury Law
- Baker McKenzie
- Fishman Haygood
- Sydow Firm
- Clark Hill
- Levinger PC
- Norton Rose
- Jones Day
- Paul Weiss
- Shidlofsky Law Firm
- Vinson & Elkins
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Silver Miller
- Karen Cook PLLC
- Canterbury PC
- Condon Tobin
- Graves Dougherty
- DeGuerin & Dickson
- Donato Brown
- Jackson Walker LLP
- Franklin Scott Conway
- Phelps Dunbar
- Hallett & Perrin
- Curtis Mallet-Prevost
Companies
- Farmers & Merchants Bank
- Toronto-Dominion Bank
- Pershing Group LLC
- HSBC Holdings PLC
- Association of Tennis Professionals
- BDO LLP
- Societe Generale
- ATP Tour Inc.
- General Electric Capital Corp.
- Aviva SA
- Dillon Gage
- Wells Fargo & Co.
- Kroll LLC
- Trustmark Corp.
- Hancock Whitney Corp.
- BDO USA LLP
- Lexington Insurance Co.
Government Agencies
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection
- Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions
- U.S. Department of Justice
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 07, 2021
Baker Botts Attys Seek Higher Fees In $65M Ponzi Deal
Baker Botts attorneys representing the receiver who reached a $65 million settlement agreement in Greenberg Traurig's alleged involvement in a $7 billion Ponzi scheme want a raise after judges approved legal fees for counsel who secured the deal.
-
February 25, 2020
$16M Fees OK'd For Greenberg Traurig's Stanford Ponzi Deal
A Texas federal judge signed off Tuesday on nearly $16 million in attorney fees for lawyers at three firms who inked a $65 million deal resolving Greenberg Traurig LLP's alleged involvement in convicted fraudster R. Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme.
-
February 21, 2020
Greenberg Traurig's $65M Deal In Stanford Ponzi Suit OK'd
A Texas federal judge on Friday gave his blessing to Greenberg Traurig's $65 million settlement of claims related to its alleged involvement in a $7 billion scheme run by convicted Ponzi scammer R. Allen Stanford.
-
October 04, 2017
Objectors Can't Undo $65M Stanford Scam Insurance Deal
A Texas federal judge on Tuesday shot down three separate motions seeking to undo a $65 million settlement between the receiver for jailed Ponzi schemer R. Allen Stanford's companies and three insurance underwriters, saying their arguments were already addressed or had been waived.
-
September 27, 2017
SEC Befuddled By Ponzi Schemer's Latest Call For Legal Rep
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission asked a Texas federal judge on Tuesday to disregard jailed Ponzi schemer R. Allen Stanford’s latest request for a lawyer, saying he lost the case several years ago and lacks a legal leg to stand on.
-
September 08, 2017
Ponzi Mastermind Blasts $34M Hunton Settlement Deal
Robert Allen Stanford, a financier who once appeared on the Forbes 400 list before his massive international Ponzi scheme was exposed, objected Friday to a $34 million settlement deal struck by one of his former law firms, Hunton & Williams LLP.
-
May 16, 2017
Lloyd's $65M Stanford Scam Deal OK'd; Attys Get $14M
A Texas federal judge approved amid objections on Tuesday a $65 million deal resolving allegations Lloyd's of London and other underwriters should cover losses from R. Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme, and awarded $14 million in attorneys' fees to counsel representing the receiver in the insurance dispute.
-
September 07, 2016
Stanford Receiver, Investors Seek OK Of $120M Willis Deal
The receiver overseeing recovery for victims of R. Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme and investors on Wednesday asked a Texas federal judge to sign off on a $120 million settlement with insurance brokerage Willis Towers Watson Public Ltd. Co.
-
August 31, 2016
Stanford Receiver's $35M Chadbourne Deal Gets Final OK
A Texas federal judge on Tuesday signed off on a $35 million settlement between Chadbourne & Parke LLP and the receiver overseeing recovery for victims of R. Allen Stanford's $7 billion Ponzi scheme.
-
August 05, 2016
Stanford Receiver Pushes For OK Of $35M Chadbourne Deal
The receiver for the $7 billion Robert Allen Stanford Ponzi scheme on Friday pushed a Texas court to approve a $35 million settlement deal he's reached with Chadbourne & Parke LLP over the objections of some individual Venezuelan investors, arguing their issues seem to stem from a misunderstanding of the deal.