Rodriguez, et al v. FDIC
Case Number:
17-1281
Court:
Nature of Suit:
3422 Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 24, 2020
10th Circ. Declines Rehearing Of Defunct Bank's Refund Row
The Tenth Circuit on Friday denied a request by a defunct bank's corporate parent to rehear its decision to award a $4.1 million tax refund to the FDIC, after the U.S. Supreme Court had weighed in on the case.
-
July 10, 2020
10th Circ. Asked To Rethink Defunct Bank's Tax Refund Row
A defunct bank's corporate parent asked the full Tenth Circuit on Friday to review a decision awarding a $4.1 million tax refund to the FDIC as the bank's receiver, saying a U.S. Supreme Court mandate to apply state law wasn't followed.
-
May 26, 2020
10th Circ. Again Rules FDIC Gets Disputed $4.1M Tax Refund
The Tenth Circuit found again Tuesday that the FDIC, as a defunct bank's receiver, was entitled to a $4.1 million tax refund instead of the bank's bankrupt parent in a case on remand from the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
April 21, 2020
$4M Refund Goes To Bank's Bankruptcy Estate, 10th Circ. Told
A defunct bank's bankruptcy estate has told the Tenth Circuit it should receive a $4.1 million tax refund because the U.S. Supreme Court recently overruled federal common law previously entitling the refund to the FDIC, the bank's receiver.
-
June 19, 2018
FDIC Gets $4.1M Refund In Ch. 7 Case, 10th Circ. Affirms
A Tenth Circuit panel sided with a lower court Tuesday, finding the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., a receiver to a failed Colorado bank — and not its parent company, which filed for bankruptcy — was entitled to a $4.1 million federal tax refund because an ambiguous reading of a tax allocation agreement favored the FDIC.