Michael Rattagan v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

20-16796

Court:

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit:

4370 Other Fraud

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. June 04, 2024

    Atty's Argentine Uber Debut Fight Lands At Calif. High Court

    Barring fraudulent concealment claims under the so-called economic loss doctrine would create "perverse incentives" for people to draw others into contracts and "have their way with them," the California Supreme Court was told Tuesday by counsel for an Argentinian attorney suing Uber on allegations it hid crucial information from him.

  2. February 15, 2022

    Calif. High Court Will Hear Argentine Atty's Uber Fraud Suit

    The California Supreme Court will consider whether an Argentine lawyer can sue Uber under Golden State law for allegedly hiding crucial information about its regulatory compliance when he represented Uber's subsidiaries during the ride-hailing giant's problem-plagued Buenos Aires launch.

  3. December 07, 2021

    9th Circ. Sends Argentine Atty's Uber Suit To Calif. High Court

    The Ninth Circuit has asked the California Supreme Court to decide whether an Argentine lawyer can sue Uber under California law alleging the company hid important information from him when he represented its subsidiaries during its problem-plagued Buenos Aires launch.