Whirlpool Intl Holdings, et al v. CIR
Case Number:
20-1900
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 28, 2022
Industry Groups Ask 6th Circ. To Reconsider Whirlpool Ruling
The Sixth Circuit should reconsider a December ruling that Whirlpool owes taxes on $45 million in income relating to operations that a Luxembourg subsidiary conducted in Mexico, several industry groups told the court.
-
January 27, 2022
6th Circ. Urged To Reconsider $45M Foreign Income Case
The Sixth Circuit should reconsider its holding that $45 million in income related to operations a Whirlpool subsidiary conducted in Mexico was foreign base company sales income, because it ignored an exception in Treasury regulations, a manufacturing association said Thursday.
-
December 22, 2021
Top International Tax Cases Of 2021
Significant rulings in international tax cases during 2021 put European Union and U.S. tax policies to the test while also suggesting an erosion of attorney-client privilege stateside. Here, Law360 examines the top rulings of the year in three distinct areas of international tax.
-
February 16, 2021
Whirlpool's $50M Foreign Income Not Taxable, 6th Circ. Told
The U.S. Tax Court incorrectly applied the U.S. Treasury's manufacturing branch rule to determine that Whirlpool owes tax on $50 million in income generated by a Luxembourg affiliate's sales to a Mexican subsidiary, the company told the Sixth Circuit.
-
January 22, 2021
Whirlpool's $50M Foreign Income Taxable In US, 6th Circ. Told
The U.S. Tax Court correctly found that Whirlpool generated almost $50 million in additional taxable income through a Luxembourg affiliate's sales and it should have to pay tax on the amount, the U.S. government told the Sixth Circuit Friday.
-
November 17, 2020
Whirlpool's $50M Foreign Income Is Not Taxable, 6th Circ. Told
Whirlpool's roughly $50 million in offshore earnings isn't taxable income because it was generated by two foreign affiliates manufacturing different products, the company told the Sixth Circuit Tuesday, urging it to reverse a U.S. Tax Court decision.