In Re Grand Jury v.
Case Number:
21-1397
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Bradley Arant
- Gibson Dunn
- Harrang Long
- Jones Day
- Kramer Levin
- Munger Tolles
- Proskauer Rose
- Redgrave LLP
- Williams & Connolly
Companies
- American Bar Association
- American College of Tax Counsel
- Atlantic Legal Foundation Inc.
- Lawyers for Civil Justice
- Silicon Valley Tax Directors Group
- Washington Legal Foundation
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 19, 2022
Feds Tell Justices To Reject 'Supersized' Privilege Test
Communications including both legal and nonlegal advice should not be shielded from grand jury subpoenas by a "supersized" attorney-client privilege unless their primary purpose is legal aid, the federal government told the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
December 05, 2022
ACC, Chamber Urge High Court To Protect In-House Privilege
Groups representing in-house attorneys have asked the Supreme Court to overturn the Ninth Circuit's test for determining if a legal and non-legal communication is privileged, saying the test makes it difficult for attorneys to know beforehand if such communications will be protected.
-
November 28, 2022
Tax Atty Group Urges Justices To Scrap Strict Privilege Test
The U.S. Supreme Court should reject an appeals court's narrow approach to determining whether mixed-use legal communications are covered by attorney-client privilege, a group of tax attorneys said in support of a law firm's bid to shield tax advice from grand jury subpoenas.
-
November 23, 2022
ABA Asks Justices To Leave Atty-Client Privilege Alone
The American Bar Association has urged the U.S. Supreme Court not to tweak the long-standing attorney-client privilege, lending its voice to a highly watched case involving a law firm's efforts to shield tax advice from grand jury subpoenas.
-
November 23, 2022
Tech Tax Pros Ask Justices For Broad Privilege Ruling
A group of Silicon Valley tax practitioners urged the U.S. Supreme Court to adopt a broad application of attorney-client privilege in a case involving a law firm's efforts to shield dual-purpose communications involving tax advice from subpoenas.
-
November 18, 2022
IP Attys Urge Justices To Adopt Broad Atty-Client Privilege
An intellectual property group urged the U.S. Supreme Court to endorse a broad application of attorney-client privilege to mixed-use client communications, arguing it shouldn't adopt a more stringent privilege standard in a case involving a firm's efforts to shield tax advice from subpoenas.
-
November 16, 2022
Firm Asks Justices To Protect Dual-Purpose Client Comms
The U.S. Supreme Court should adopt a broad interpretation of attorney-client privilege that shields mixed-use legal advice if it has a significant legal purpose, an unnamed tax law firm fighting to protect client communications from grand jury subpoenas said Wednesday.
-
November 04, 2022
The Supreme Court's Week: By The Numbers
This past week saw arguments in two highly anticipated cases over affirmative action at colleges and two more involving post-conviction relief for prisoners, as well as a protest that interrupted the justices' consideration of a tax case. Here, Law360 Pulse takes a data-driven dive into the week that was at the U.S. Supreme Court.
-
October 27, 2022
High Court Privilege Case Could Hinder In-House Counsel
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review a tax-related case concerning the scope of attorney-client privilege for multipurpose communications, and the outcome could potentially interfere with the work of in-house counsel, whose communications within a company often involve nonlegal business matters.
-
October 21, 2022
Tax Pros Hope For Broad Privilege Ruling From High Court
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed this month to review a tax-related case on attorney-client privilege, and practitioners hope the court will use the occasion to take a broad approach toward privilege that acknowledges the importance of tax advice.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →