Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Anastasia Wullschleger, et al.
Case Number:
23-677
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Bartimus Frickleton
- Freshfields
- Goodwin Procter
- Hogan Lovells
- Keller Postman
- Plunkett Cooney
- White & Case
Government Agencies
-
October 07, 2024
Decision In Jurisdictional Case 'Outlier,' High Court Told
An attorney representing Royal Canin USA Inc. and Nestlé Purina PetCare Co. on Monday told the U.S. Supreme Court that a jurisdictional decision in a case over prescription dog food is both an "extreme outlier" and goes against more than a hundred years of precedent.
-
October 06, 2024
Top 5 Supreme Court Cases To Watch This Fall
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear several cases in its October 2024 term that could further refine the new administrative law landscape, establish constitutional rights to gender-affirming care for transgender minors and affect how the federal government regulates water, air and weapons. Here, Law360 looks at five of the most important cases on the Supreme Court's docket so far.
-
October 04, 2024
Up First At High Court: Civil Rights, Ghost Guns, Atty Fees
The U.S. Supreme Court reconvenes Monday to start a brand-new term, with the justices first hearing arguments related to prerequisites for litigating federal rights in state courts, ghost gun regulations, and whether a death row inmate is entitled to a new trial after a state admits that prosecutorial misconduct might have led to his conviction.
-
April 29, 2024
High Court To Decide Jurisdiction In Dog Food Label Suit
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to take up an appeal from Royal Canin USA Inc. and Nestle Purina PetCare Co. in a dispute over whether a suit alleging they falsely represent their products as prescriptions belongs in state or federal court.