Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Whistleblower Hasn't Proved Retaliation In Tariff Fraud Case

By Kevin Pinner · March 14, 2025, 7:12 PM EDT

A former employee of two defunct footwear companies has not shown her boss fired her for confronting him about a scheme she alleged he ran to lower tariffs on certain shoes,...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Order

Case Information

Case Title

United States of America et al v. GMI Corporation

Case Number

1:16-cv-07216

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a))

Date Filed

September 15, 2016

Recent Articles By Kevin

March 13, 2025
Funding Deficiency May Hinder UN Tax Talks, Group Says
March 12, 2025
Starbucks' Sourcing Aided $1.3B Low-Tax Profits, Report Says
March 12, 2025
Tariffs Prompt Chipmakers To Look At Manufacturing Moves
March 11, 2025
Trump, Ontario Back Down After Two-Day Trade Flare-Up
March 10, 2025
Treasury's CTA Halt Doesn't Justify Block, Feds Tell 5th Circ.
March 06, 2025
Trump Gives Mexico A Break Until April From New Tariffs
March 04, 2025
Trump's Mexico, Canada Tariffs To Face Legal Tests, Pros Say
March 03, 2025
Treasury Halts Enforcement Of Corporate Transparency Act
February 28, 2025
UN Tax Pact Best Bet For Certainty, Sovereignty, Report Says
February 27, 2025
EU Prepared To Retaliate Against US Over Tariffs, Officials Say