Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Pa. Justices Ask Why CBD Isn't 'Medicine' For Hurt Workers

By Matthew Santoni · November 20, 2024, 2:43 PM EST

Justices on the Pennsylvania Supreme Court questioned Wednesday why they should accept an insurer's assertion that hemp-derived CBD oil should be deemed dangerous, when an injured attorney's physician had prescribed it...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Recent Articles By Matthew

October 28, 2024
NLRB Told To Study Starbucks Case In Newspaper Union Battle
October 23, 2024
How FINRA Filings Led To A $29M Defamation Verdict In Pa.
October 15, 2024
Ex-'Top Chef' Hopeful Sues Over Ouster From Food Hall
October 07, 2024
Justices Turn Down Pa. Ex-Museum Worker's Retaliation Suit
October 03, 2024
Sens. Question If Payouts Taint Execs' Push For US Steel Deal
October 01, 2024
Client's Late Arrival, Bankruptcy Complicate Age Bias Suit
September 30, 2024
Irish Jockey's EB-1 Visa Suit Won't Cross Finish Line
September 23, 2024
3rd Circ. Vexed By Time-Tracking Role In $22M Wage Case
September 19, 2024
3rd Circ. Curious When Workplace Acts Become 'Concerted'
August 29, 2024
Airline Ducks Liquidated Damages In Military Leave Suit

Pa. Justices Ask Why CBD Isn't 'Medicine' For Hurt Workers

Related Sections

Recent Articles By Matthew