Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Goldman Calls Addition Of Sex-Bias Intervenors Prejudicial

By Matthew Bultman · September 10, 2015, 7:00 PM EDT

Former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. employees suing the company for sex discrimination shouldn't be allowed to add two new representatives to their proposed class action, the company insisted this week, telling...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Brief

Case Information

Case Title

Chen-Oster et al v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC. et al

Case Number

1:10-cv-06950

Court

New York Southern

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Jobs

Date Filed

September 15, 2010

Recent Articles By Matthew

December 13, 2016
Employment MVP: Akin Gump's Daniel Nash
October 21, 2016
7th Circ. Rules Against Fired Worker Who Sued Colleagues
October 21, 2016
FedEx Drivers' $15M Wage Deal Gets Green Light
October 21, 2016
Ky. High Court Strikes Louisville Minimum Wage Ordinance
October 20, 2016
Calif. Appeals Court Rejects Wage Statement Challenge
October 20, 2016
EEOC Urges Judge To Uphold 'Onionhead' Religion Decision
October 20, 2016
NLRB Agrees It Has Jurisdiction Over Pa. Charter School
October 19, 2016
On-Demand Employers Should Expect More EEOC Scrutiny
October 18, 2016
Ill. Judge Urges Against Transgender Locker Room Ban
October 18, 2016
Employers Cross-Appeal In Migrant Workers' Wage Suit