Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Uber Says NJ Driver Must Arbitrate Misclassification Claims

By Jeannie O'Sullivan · June 3, 2016, 7:08 PM EDT

Uber Technologies Inc. attempted Friday to toss one of the latest class actions accusing it of misclassifying drivers as contractors in order to avoid operation expenses and sidestep labor laws, telling...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Dismiss

Case Information

Case Title

SINGH v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case Number

3:16-cv-03044

Court

New Jersey

Nature of Suit

Labor: Other

Date Filed

May 27, 2016

Recent Articles By Jeannie

March 20, 2024
Conn. Panel Says Carveout Allows Cop To Fight Firing
December 13, 2023
NC Trucking Co. Must Face Ex-Worker's WARN Suit
April 13, 2022
Nursing Home Workers' Insurance Scam Claims Survive
April 11, 2022
UBS Freed From Ex-Exec's NJ Whistleblower Suit
April 06, 2022
SEIU Launches FTC Suit Over NJ Co.'s 'No Hire' Rule
April 05, 2022
Amazon Wins Bid To Arbitrate Delivery Driver's NJ Wage Suit
April 04, 2022
M&T Bank Is Accused Of Plot To Oust Older Workers
March 22, 2022
3rd Circ. Ponders Venue In Atty's Free Speech Dispute
March 21, 2022
NJ Transit Sleep Apnea Policy Is Misdirected, Panel Told
March 16, 2022
Virus Whistleblower Suit Short On Specifics, NJ Officials Say