FCA Attys Clash Over Escobar Test For Implicit Compliance

By Jeff Overley · August 26, 2016, 3:26 PM EDT

False Claims Act attorneys are deeply split over a crucial section in the U.S. Supreme Court's Escobar ruling, debating whether its test of implicit statements about regulatory compliance is mandatory and...

To view the full article, register now.
Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Rose et al v. Stephens Institute

Case Number

4:09-cv-05966

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

December 21, 2009

Case Title

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. et. al. v. RAYTHEON COMPANY et al

Case Number

2:06-cv-03614

Court

California Central

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

June 09, 2006

Case Title

United States ex rel. Badr v. Triple Canopy, Inc.

Case Number

13-2190

Court

Appellate - 4th Circuit

Nature of Suit

1890 Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

September 25, 2013

Case Title

US, ex rel. Escobar, et al v. Universal Health Services, Inc

Case Number

14-1423

Court

Appellate - 1st Circuit

Nature of Suit

3890 Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

April 15, 2014

Case Title

USA ex rel. Steven Mateski, et al v. Raytheon Co.

Case Number

14-56798

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

1890 Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

November 17, 2014

Case Title

United States of America et al v. Astrazeneca Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al

Case Number

1:14-cv-01718

Court

New York Eastern

Nature of Suit

Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

March 17, 2014

Recent Articles By Jeff