Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Uber Doesn't Need To Produce More Docs In Trade Secret Row

By Rachel Graf · June 26, 2017, 4:17 PM EDT

A California magistrate judge determined Monday that Uber Technologies Inc. doesn't need to produce additional documents that are privileged from disclosure, saying Waymo LLC hasn't proven that Uber hired attorneys in...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Order

Case Information

Case Title

Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Case Number

3:17-cv-00939

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Patent

Date Filed

February 23, 2017

Recent Articles By Rachel

November 15, 2019
SEC Whistleblower Office Nets $2B Sanctions After Slower '19
October 11, 2019
Congress Looks To Expand Financial Whistleblower Definition
September 23, 2019
Nissan, Ex-CEO Pay SEC $16M To End Compensation Claims
September 19, 2019
CFTC Calls For Whistleblower Tips As Enforcement Evolves
August 01, 2019
5th Circ. Wrong To Nix $65M Stanford Ponzi Deal, Lloyd's Says
July 12, 2019
Signet: Investor Cert. Needs Clarification. Judge: WRONG
July 10, 2019
Signet Investors Win Cert. In Harassment Statements Suit
June 28, 2019
The Biggest Securities Decisions Of 2019: Midyear Report
June 17, 2019
5th Circ. Sinks $65M Stanford Insurance Scam Deal
June 11, 2019
Signet Can't Duck Investor Suit Over Harassment Statements