Laith G. Cox, Petitioner v. United States

Track this case

Case Number:

16-1017

Court:

Supreme Court

Nature of Suit:

  1. June 22, 2018

    High Court Says Gitmo Judgeships Are Constitutional

    Judges who simultaneously serve on both a military criminal court and a Guantanamo Bay review court do not violate a constitutional bar on "dual office-holding," because they are specifically authorized to do so by law, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Friday.

  2. January 16, 2018

    High Court Skeptical Of Challenge To Terror Review Judges

    The U.S. Supreme Court gave a skeptical reception to former service members who argued Tuesday they had been impermissibly convicted by judges wrongly serving simultaneously on both a terror conviction review court and a military court, digging into the question of whether the review court judgeships are a civilian role.

  3. January 15, 2018

    Up Next At High Court: Betraying A Client, Appellate Rules

    A lawyer’s courtroom betrayal of his client in a Louisiana murder trial is likely the juiciest item on the Supreme Court’s oral argument calendar this week, but other cases involving the right of appeal in consolidated cases and a controversial question under the Fair Labor Standards Act could have major implications for the appellate and employment bars. Here's what to expect.