United States of America ex rel. Hassan Foreman v. AECOM, et al

  1. February 27, 2025

    Relator Fights Discovery Ruling In FCA Suit Against AECOM

    A whistleblower accusing AECOM of falsely billing the U.S. Army on a $1.9 billion contract urged a New York federal judge to rethink a decision to deny discovery requests, arguing the company improperly withheld information it's now asserting in a summary judgment bid.

  2. December 03, 2024

    Judge Won't Strike AECOM's 'New' Claims In Army Billing Suit

    A New York federal judge rejected a whistleblower's attempt to strike AECOM's purportedly new arguments in litigation accusing it of falsely billing the U.S. Army on a $1.9 billion support deal, writing "denied" in the margin of the whistleblower's request.

  3. November 18, 2024

    AECOM Calls FCA Suit Alleging False Army Billing 'Meritless'

    AECOM has pushed to end a False Claims Act suit alleging that it falsely billed the U.S. Army on a $1.9 billion support deal, saying the whistleblower who filed the suit hadn't shown that his remaining allegations were material to the government.

  4. November 19, 2021

    2nd Circ. Revives Fraud Billing Claim In $1.9B Army Deal Suit

    The Second Circuit partially revived a whistleblower's suit alleging AECOM breached a $1.9 billion maintenance deal with the U.S. Army, finding Friday that the lower court shouldn't have considered an external document when tossing accusations of false billing practices.

  5. May 12, 2020

    AECOM Rips 'Confused' Whistleblower On $1.9B Army Deal

    Military contractor AECOM repeatedly called a former supervisor-turned-whistleblower "confused" in his efforts to revive claims that a $1.9 billion agreement to provide the U.S. Army with transportation services was violated, after a New York federal judge already let the contractor off the hook.

  6. April 28, 2020

    AECOM Kept $1.9B Deal Because Of War, Whistleblower Says

    A whistleblower urged a New York federal judge to revive a lawsuit against military contractor AECOM, saying the U.S. Army's decision to extend the company's $1.9 billion contract despite fraud reports did not undermine his claims since it was necessary to maintain the military's presence in Afghanistan.

  7. April 14, 2020

    AECOM Beats Whistleblower Suit Over $1.9B Army Deal

    A New York federal judge has tossed a whistleblower's suit alleging that AECOM violated its $1.9 billion maintenance deal with the U.S. Army, saying that the government's knowledge of these breaches shows that they weren't significant to the contract.