October 05, 2018
ARRINGTON v. BURGER KING WORLDWIDE, INC. et al
Case Number:
1:18-cv-24128
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Alexander Appellate Law
- Boies Schiller
- Carella Byrne
- Heise Suarez
- Kessler Topaz
- Lieff Cabraser
- Milberg Coleman
- Morgan & Morgan
- Podhurst Orseck
- Robbins Geller
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 17, 2025
Burger King Workers Defend Revived No-Poach Case
Burger King employees are defending their proposed class action over the fast-food chain's past use of no-poach provisions in its franchise agreements, as the restaurant urges a Florida federal court to toss the claims despite an appeals court reviving them in 2022.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login