National Collegiate Athletic Association, Petitioner v. Shawne Alston, et al.

  1. July 07, 2021

    Athletes Want $3.5M Put On NCAA's Tab After High Court Win

    Attorneys for a group of college athletes said Tuesday that the NCAA must repay $3.5 million they spent convincing the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down the organization's rules restricting education-related pay and benefits, a sum that would bring their total legal fees in the landmark case to $37.6 million.

  2. June 21, 2021

    Justices Send NCAA Message: Change Or Face More Suits

    By rejecting the NCAA's arguments that its amateurism system should get blanket protection from antitrust challenges, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday made clear that the organization must allow athletes to profit from or share in the revenues of college sports — or face an uncertain future of litigation.

  3. June 21, 2021

    College Athletes Call Justices' NCAA Ruling A Game Changer

    Current and former college athletes nationwide on Monday celebrated a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that they said will provide life-changing benefits for many players while adding momentum to an ongoing push to let athletes monetize their names and images.

  4. June 21, 2021

    High Court Says NCAA Can't Limit Athlete Education Pay

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday affirmed a ruling that struck down NCAA rules restricting education-related compensation and benefits for college athletes, finding that the organization should not get special treatment under antitrust law.

  5. March 31, 2021

    Justices Skeptical NCAA Amateurism Deserves A Pass

    The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court were skeptical during oral arguments Wednesday that NCAA rules meant to keep college players from being paid should get broad deference from courts, but also raised concerns about a potential flood of litigation challenging amateurism in college sports depending on the outcome of the closely watched antitrust case.

  6. March 30, 2021

    Top Court's NCAA Matchup: WilmerHale Vs. Winston & Strawn

    Wednesday's U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in a closely-watched antitrust case challenging NCAA amateurism rules will pit a prominent high court litigator against one of the most recognizable names in sports law, not to mention the acting solicitor general's first appearance in that role.

  7. March 26, 2021

    Up Next At High Court: Acting SG Makes Debut In NCAA Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court returns to the telephonic "courtroom" this week with a full load of class action litigation touching on everything from Goldman Sachs' statements in securities filings to the NCAA's amateurism rules, an antitrust case that will feature Elizabeth Prelogar's first high court argument as acting solicitor general.

  8. March 26, 2021

    NCAA Amateurism Under Microscope In High Court Args

    The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments Wednesday on what role courts should play in reviewing the NCAA's amateurism system, teeing up a potential landmark decision answering long-simmering questions about the organization's legal authority to narrowly define the rights of college athletes.

  9. March 19, 2021

    High Court Allows DOJ To Join NCAA Amateurism Arguments

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday granted the U.S. Department of Justice's request to take part in oral arguments in support of college athletes in a case looking at whether the NCAA's amateurism system for college sports may be reviewed under antitrust law.

  10. March 10, 2021

    Pro Players Warn Justices Of Dangers Of NCAA Amateurism

    The biggest unions in professional sports have joined the chorus of voices imploring the U.S. Supreme Court to find that the National Collegiate Athletic Association has been trampling on antitrust laws by restricting compensation and education-related benefits for its athletes.