Borozny et al. v. RTX Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division, et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

3:21-cv-01657

Court:

Connecticut

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Sarala V. Nagala

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. January 03, 2025

    RTX's $34M No-Poach Deal Gets First Nod From Conn. Judge

    A Connecticut federal judge on Friday gave an initial approval to a $34 million class action settlement by RTX Corp. to end claims that the company's Pratt & Whitney division cooked up an agreement among contractors not to hire one another's aerospace engineers.

  2. December 18, 2024

    RTX Will Pay $34M To End Engineers' No-Poach Class Action

    A group of engineers asked a Connecticut federal judge Wednesday to greenlight a $34 million settlement resolving claims that RTX Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division orchestrated an agreement among five aerospace engineering firms not to hire one another's employees, following the workers' $26.5 million settlement with the five other firms.

  3. August 30, 2024

    RTX Corp. To Settle Engineers' No-Poach Class Claims

    RTX Corp. on Friday announced a nascent class action settlement in a lawsuit accusing its Pratt & Whitney division of orchestrating an agreement among five aerospace engineering suppliers not to hire one another's employees, a move that follows a $26.5 million settlement between the employees and the five other firms.

  4. August 16, 2024

    Connecticut Litigation Highlights Of 2024: A Midyear Report

    Several high-stakes Connecticut cases came to a close in the first half of 2024, resulting in the resolution of Frontier Communications' $21.8 million feud with its ex-CEO and a $26.5 million deal for RTX Corp. subcontractors and employees who alleged that anticompetitive no-poach agreements prevented them from advancing their careers.

  5. July 12, 2024

    Engineering Firms Ink $26.5M Deals To End 'No-Poach' Claims

    Four engineering firms have agreed to shell out a total of $26.5 million, while a fifth has pledged to cooperate, to settle a proposed class action alleging they conspired to restrict hiring through "no-poach" agreements, leaving RTX Corp. unit Pratt & Whitney as the sole defendant, plaintiffs told a Connecticut federal judge on Friday.

  6. May 10, 2024

    Engineering Firm Inks Latest Deal In Conn. No-Poach Suit

    Belcan Engineering Group LLC has reached a deal with a proposed class of aerospace workers who accused it of conspiring with a Raytheon Technologies Corp. subsidiary and others to restrict hiring through anti-competitive "no-poach" agreements, according to a notice filed in Connecticut federal court.

  7. April 17, 2024

    RTX Investor Sues Brass In Del. For Better Antitrust Oversight

    A shareholder of RTX has sued the aerospace and defense giant's current and former officers and directors in Delaware's Court of Chancery, accusing them of failing over a period of at least eight years to prevent antitrust violations in the company's hiring practices.

  8. January 24, 2024

    Aerospace Contractor Inks $7.4M Deal In Conn. No-Poach Suit

    An aerospace subcontractor accused alongside Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division and others of conspiring to restrict hiring will pay $7.4 million to resolve the antitrust claims, according to a notice filed Wednesday in Connecticut federal court that indicates three other deals are also on the horizon.

  9. August 04, 2023

    Contractor In Conn. No-Poach Case Files $5.6M Fla. Ch. 11

    Parametric Solutions Inc., one of the Pratt & Whitney contractors accused of engaging in an anti-competitive hiring agreement in Connecticut, has filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the Southern District of Florida, citing $6.1 million in assets and at least $5.6 million in liabilities.

  10. June 05, 2023

    Connecticut Cases To Watch: A Midyear Report

    Courts in Connecticut are working through thorny legal issues involving controversies of national interest and headline-grabbing public figures, and significant decisions in high-dollar civil cases are possible before the end of 2023.