Borozny et al. v. RTX Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division, et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

3:21-cv-01657

Court:

Connecticut

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Sarala V. Nagala

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. July 12, 2024

    Engineering Firms Ink $26.5M Deals To End 'No-Poach' Claims

    Four engineering firms have agreed to shell out a total of $26.5 million, while a fifth has pledged to cooperate, to settle a proposed class action alleging they conspired to restrict hiring through "no-poach" agreements, leaving RTX Corp. unit Pratt & Whitney as the sole defendant, plaintiffs told a Connecticut federal judge on Friday.

  2. May 10, 2024

    Engineering Firm Inks Latest Deal In Conn. No-Poach Suit

    Belcan Engineering Group LLC has reached a deal with a proposed class of aerospace workers who accused it of conspiring with a Raytheon Technologies Corp. subsidiary and others to restrict hiring through anti-competitive "no-poach" agreements, according to a notice filed in Connecticut federal court.

  3. April 17, 2024

    RTX Investor Sues Brass In Del. For Better Antitrust Oversight

    A shareholder of RTX has sued the aerospace and defense giant's current and former officers and directors in Delaware's Court of Chancery, accusing them of failing over a period of at least eight years to prevent antitrust violations in the company's hiring practices.

  4. January 24, 2024

    Aerospace Contractor Inks $7.4M Deal In Conn. No-Poach Suit

    An aerospace subcontractor accused alongside Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division and others of conspiring to restrict hiring will pay $7.4 million to resolve the antitrust claims, according to a notice filed Wednesday in Connecticut federal court that indicates three other deals are also on the horizon.

  5. August 04, 2023

    Contractor In Conn. No-Poach Case Files $5.6M Fla. Ch. 11

    Parametric Solutions Inc., one of the Pratt & Whitney contractors accused of engaging in an anti-competitive hiring agreement in Connecticut, has filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the Southern District of Florida, citing $6.1 million in assets and at least $5.6 million in liabilities.

  6. June 05, 2023

    Connecticut Cases To Watch: A Midyear Report

    Courts in Connecticut are working through thorny legal issues involving controversies of national interest and headline-grabbing public figures, and significant decisions in high-dollar civil cases are possible before the end of 2023.

  7. April 06, 2023

    Supplier Admits To No-Poach 'Agreement' In Raytheon Case

    A supplier to Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division has admitted that it "voluntarily participated" in a no-poaching agreement among several aerospace companies, but it denied that it knew the deal was illegal and fought several damages demands in a recent filing.

  8. March 07, 2023

    Raytheon Denies Wrongdoing In Conn. No-Poaching Case

    Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division has denied all wrongdoing in a proposed class action over an alleged no-poaching scheme, saying that any employment actions it undertook were lawful ways to further its "legitimate business interests."

  9. February 14, 2023

    DOJ Asks Judge To Rethink Order In Raytheon Poaching Case

    The U.S. Department of Justice has asked a Connecticut federal judge to reconsider a portion of a ruling in a putative class action accusing Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division of secretly agreeing with other companies not to recruit or hire its talent in the aerospace sector.

  10. January 23, 2023

    Pratt & Whitney, 5 Contractors Lose Bid To Toss Antitrust Suit

    A proposed antitrust class action against Raytheon Technologies Corp.'s Pratt & Whitney division and several of its aerospace subcontractors can continue, a Connecticut federal court ruled, rejecting the companies' bid to toss out allegations that they worked together to restrict hiring and suppress salaries.