Su v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

3:22-cv-00849

Court:

Florida Middle

Nature of Suit:

Labor: E.R.I.S.A.

Judge:

Marcia Morales Howard

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. March 27, 2024

    ​​​​​​​CSX Can't End DOL's Improper Retirement Plan Fee Suit

    A Florida federal judge backed a magistrate judge's recommendation Wednesday that the court knock down CSX Transportation Inc.'s bid to dismiss a suit alleging it mismanaged its retirement plan fees, discarding the company's concerns that the report made improper legal conclusions.

  2. November 08, 2023

    DOL Fights CSX's Objections To Facing ERISA Fee Suit

    The U.S. Department of Labor urged a Florida federal judge Wednesday to adopt a report advising denial of CSX Transportation's bid to dismiss a suit alleging the rail company mismanaged its employee retirement plans, arguing the company misunderstood the recommendation and relevant federal benefits law.

  3. October 26, 2023

    CSX Says Judge 'Improperly' Opposed Tossing ERISA Suit

    CSX Transportation urged a Florida federal judge to reject a report batting down its bid to dismiss a U.S. Department of Labor lawsuit alleging it failed to keep track of its employee retirement plans' fees, arguing the department hasn't shown it ran afoul of federal benefits law.

  4. October 12, 2023

    CSX Unlikely To Escape DOL's ERISA Retirement Fee Suit

    A Florida magistrate judge recommended denying CSX Transportation's motion to dismiss a suit brought by the U.S. Department of Labor alleging the freight rail giant unlawfully took fees from a trust meant to fund its employee retirement plans, finding the DOL had plausibly alleged mismanagement by CSX.

  5. August 08, 2023

    DOL Says CSX Committees Rubber-Stamped Fee Requests

    The U.S. Department of Labor urged a Florida federal judge not to toss its suit alleging CSX Transportation Inc. unlawfully took fees from a trust meant to fund its employee retirement plans, arguing the plans' overseers weren't actually independent and didn't review the company's requests.