Shruhan v. Apple Inc.

  1. November 22, 2024

    Calif. Forecast: Meta Wants Citizen Bias Suit Discovery Stayed

    In the next two weeks, attorneys should keep an eye out for the potential pause on discovery in a U.S. citizen discrimination proposed class action against Facebook owner Meta Platforms Inc. Here's a look at that case and other labor and employment matters coming up in California.

  2. April 11, 2024

    Apple Must Face Former Executive's Trimmed Age Bias Suit

    A California federal judge narrowed a former Apple executive's suit alleging his age led the company to withhold bonuses, though the suit stands, as the judge said it sufficiently showed a contract was breached when the company did not pay a hefty stock retention bonus.

  3. March 08, 2024

    Calif. Forecast: Apple Wants Claim Gone From Age Bias Suit

    In the coming week, attorneys should keep an eye out for a potential ruling on a bid to dismiss part of a former Apple executive's age discrimination lawsuit. Here's a look at that case and other labor and employment matters on deck in California.

  4. March 31, 2023

    Calif. Forecast: UPS Seeks To Kill Gender Bias Suit

    In the next week, attorneys should keep an eye out for the potential tossing of a proposed gender discrimination class and collective action that could impact tens of thousands of United Parcel Service Inc. workers. Here's a look at that case and other labor and employment matters coming up in California.

  5. November 03, 2022

    Apple Says Exec's Age Bias Suit Short On Facts, Redundant

    Apple Inc. asked a California federal judge to toss an executive's discrimination case, arguing he hadn't shown he was passed over for a hefty stock bonus because of his age and had already filed an identical version of the same suit.

  6. September 28, 2022

    Apple IP Exec Says Ageism Cost Him $800K Stock Bonus

    A director in Apple's intellectual property enforcement unit claims he was denied a merit-based retention bonus worth at least $800,000 based on his age because he was no longer considered "part of Apple's future" and was "nearing retirement age," according to the complaint removed to California federal court Tuesday.