Vetnos, LLC v. SidePrize LLC

  1. December 05, 2024

    PrizePicks Faces Second Claim Of Fantasy Platform Ripoff

    Atlanta-based sports betting platform PrizePicks has been hit with a second lawsuit in as many years from business-to-business sports tech company Vetnos, claiming Wednesday that PrizePicks ripped off its concept of daily fantasy betting games with the help of a former Vetnos employee.

  2. July 10, 2024

    Fantasy Sports Co. Can't Duck Claims It Ripped Off IP

    A Georgia federal judge on Tuesday declined to dismiss a patent infringement suit between two fantasy sports tech companies, siding with a special master's finding that the technologies in question are likely concrete enough to warrant intellectual property protection.

  3. March 28, 2024

    Special Master Suggests Denying Bid To Toss Gaming IP Row

    A special master in the Northern District of Georgia has recommended denying an attempt to throw out patent infringement and trade secret claims that New York-based sports tech company Vetnos LLC has lodged against Atlanta-based rival PrizePicks.

  4. November 21, 2023

    Special Master Appointed In Ga. Sports Gaming IP Feud

    A Georgia federal judge on Tuesday appointed a special master to oversee a dispute over whether a Peach State fantasy sports company stole trade secrets and infringed patents owned by another sports technology firm.

  5. September 29, 2023

    Ga. Fantasy Sports Platform Can't Dodge IP Suit, Rival Says

    Vetnos LLC, a business-to-business sports tech company based in New York, is urging a Georgia federal court to deny a bid from Atlanta-based daily fantasy sports gaming platform PrizePicks' to escape a suit alleging it infringed Vetnos' patents and misappropriated trade secrets to launch a fixed-odds fantasy sports game.

  6. June 21, 2023

    Ga. Fantasy Sports Platform Hit With Patent, Trade Secret Suit

    Vetnos LLC, a business-to-business sports tech company in New York, claims Atlanta-based daily fantasy sports gaming platform PrizePicks has brazenly infringed several patents and misappropriated trade secret technologies to ramp up its offerings and avoid significant development time and costs, according to a suit in Georgia federal court.