Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

23-2302

Court:

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit:

 

Companies

Government Agencies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. July 08, 2024

    5 Labor Battles To Watch In 2024's 2nd Half

    The second half of the year will feature action in several cases with major implications for the labor law landscape, including SpaceX's suits seeking to gut the National Labor Relations Board and a board case that could extend organizing rights to college athletes. Here, Law360 looks at these and other cases to watch in the second half of 2024.

  2. April 30, 2024

    SEIU Cites Starbucks Organizing In Push For Cemex Standard

    The Service Employees International Union invoked the nationwide organizing campaign at Starbucks stores in a request for the Ninth Circuit to back a National Labor Relations Board precedent shift for bargaining orders, arguing the new standard will help deter labor law violations.

  3. April 23, 2024

    NLRB Defends Bargaining Order Shift At 9th Circ.

    The National Labor Relations Board urged the Ninth Circuit to uphold a decision in which it lessened the standard for issuing bargaining orders against employers who commit labor law violations in response to organizing, saying the revised approach will better deter unfair labor practices.

  4. February 05, 2024

    Cemex Bargaining Order Ruling Omitted ULPs, Teamsters Say

    The National Labor Relations Board correctly ordered a cement manufacturer to bargain with the Teamsters after finding the company meddled in a union campaign, but it erred by dismissing a string of unfair labor practice allegations from the blockbuster case, the Teamsters told the Ninth Circuit.

  5. February 02, 2024

    Cemex Slams 'Radical' Union Recognition Revamp At 9th Circ.

    The company at the center of a blockbuster National Labor Relations Board ruling that subjects employers to bargaining orders if they meddle with union election campaigns urged the Ninth Circuit to nix this "radical change," arguing the board overstepped precedent and the law.