January 09, 2020
Masimo Corporation et al v. Apple Inc.
Case Number:
8:20-cv-00048
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Gibson Dunn
- Haynes & Boone
- Knobbe Martens
- Lewis & Llewellyn
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
November 12, 2024
Masimo Can't Tie Alleged IP Theft To Apple Profits, Expert Says
An Apple expert witness defended the company Tuesday in a California federal bench trial over Masimo's claim that the tech giant stole pulse oximetry trade secrets for its popular smartwatch, testifying Masimo cannot tie any value to the purported secrets and that Apple's profits can't be attributed to the watch's blood oxygen features.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login