April 19, 2022
Boe et al v. Marshall et al
Case Number:
2:22-cv-00184
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Constitutional - State Statute
Judge:
Firms
- Agricola Law
- Badham & Buck
- Bainbridge Mims
- Balch & Bingham
- Boyden Gray
- Cooper & Kirk
- Copeland Franco
- Covington & Burling
- Dominick Feld
- Farella Braun
- Jenner & Block
- Jones Day
- King & Spalding
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Lightfoot Franklin
- Phelps Dunbar
- Quinn Emanuel
- Shook Hardy
- Wallace Jordan
- Wilkerson & Bryan
Companies
- American Academy of Family Physicians
- American Academy of Pediatrics
- American College of Physicians
- American Family Association
- American Medical Association Inc.
- American Psychiatric Association
- Americans United for Life
- Association of American Medical Colleges
- Judicial Watch Inc.
- Texas Public Policy Foundation
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
August 06, 2024
Alabama Calls Its Gender Care Law A Rational Policy Choice
Alabama lawmakers acted out of a desire to protect children — not discriminatory intent — when they passed legislation that restricted gender-affirming care for minors, easily clearing the legal standard required to uphold the law, the state has told a federal judge.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login