Vartelas V. Holder Analysis: Date Of Commission Matters Most

Law360, New York ( December 3, 2015, 10:12 AM EST) -- Suppose you have a client who has lawful permanent resident status. He recently made a short trip abroad to lawfully visit friends and relatives, and, upon return to the United States, was placed in removal proceedings. The inspecting U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer discovered, in ordinary record checking at the port of entry, that your client has been convicted of a felony crime involving moral turpitude. The CBP officer has charged your client with being an applicant for admission and inadmissible under section 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) of the Immigration and Nationality Act; Title 8, United States Code, section 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I)....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!