6th Circ. Ruling Highlights Dangers Of Insured's Admissions
By David Kroeger and Edward Vrtis ( October 16, 2018, 1:26 PM EDT) -- The Sixth Circuit's recent decision in K.V.G. Properties Inc. v. Westfield Insurance Co. underscores that an insured's admissions in noninsurance litigation may later be used as a basis for insurers and courts to deny claims for coverage. In K.V.G. Properties, the court affirmed summary judgment in favor of an insurer in a case in which the insured sought coverage for property damage caused by tenants who surreptitiously converted the insured's warehouse into an unauthorized marijuana cultivation operation. The Sixth Circuit concluded that the damage was a covered direct physical loss but held that a dishonest or criminal acts exclusion barred coverage. To support a finding that the insured's tenants had committed a criminal act, the court held that the policyholder's pleadings in its eviction cases against the tenants (which asserted that the tenants had committed illegal acts) were binding admissions in the insured's subsequent case over its claim for insurance coverage. The Sixth Circuit concluded that these admissions made the case so one-sided that it required granting summary judgment in favor of the insurer....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.