The Uncertain Future Of Summary Judgment In California
By Scott Dixler, Melissa Edelson and Steve Fleischman ( October 30, 2018, 1:08 PM EDT) -- After decades of viewing summary judgment skeptically, the California Supreme Court has recently followed the Legislature's lead and held that summary judgment is no longer a disfavored remedy. [1] Two recent Court of Appeal decisions, however, demonstrate a continuing split of authority among the intermediate courts concerning a trial court's discretion to grant summary judgment based on noncompliance with the summary judgment statute. [2] Leyva v. Garcia exemplifies the liberalization of summary judgment law, while Levingston v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan demonstrates courts' perennial reluctance toward granting summary judgment. . . .
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
This past year, a handful of attorneys secured billions of dollars in settlements and judgments for both classes and individual plaintiffs against massive companies and organizations like Facebook, Dell, the National Association of Realtors, Johnson & Johnson, UFC and Credit Suisse, earning them recognition as Law360's Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar for 2025.