Barko Muzzled, But Attorney-Client Info Remains At Risk

Law360, New York ( August 28, 2014, 1:42 PM EDT) -- After the highly controversial D. C. District Court ruling in United States ex rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co. ,[1] which permitted discovery of attorney-client communications and attorney work product generated during a confidential internal investigation that had been undertaken in order to comply with regulatory disclosure obligations, the D. C. Circuit took the rare step of granting a writ of mandamus in order to vacate the ruling. [2] This outcome was a welcome reprieve for government contractors, and indeed, for any corporation that is subject to legal or financial disclosure obligations or incentives potentially affecting its decision to undertake an internal investigation. . . .

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login