Appellate

  • October 05, 2026

    Split 9th Circ. Backs Ex-GM Worker's $5M Bribery Conviction

    A split Ninth Circuit on Monday upheld a former General Motors Co. commodity manager's conviction for soliciting a $5 million cash bribe from an auto parts supplier in return for ensuring it secured a $100 million contract.

  • October 05, 2026

    FCC Evading Courts With 'Gamesmanship,' DC Circ. Told

    The Federal Communications Commission is pursuing a road map for evading judicial review of major rulings, an advocacy group warned the D.C. Circuit in a case challenging Fox TV's Philadelphia license.

  • October 05, 2026

    State Watchdogs Bristle At Prediction Market Incursion

    A group of state gaming regulators has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to consider reviewing Kalshi's ability to offer sports-related contracts in New Jersey, nodding to recent case law that has cut against the decision that gave rise to the state's petition.

  • October 05, 2026

    Intel Case May Clarify Dismissal Standard For 401(k) Suits

    The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday from former Intel Corp. workers looking to revive a suit claiming their retirement savings suffered because of shoddy investments, a case that could shed light on what it takes to keep challenges to allegedly subpar 401(k) offerings alive.

  • October 05, 2026

    'Shocking' COVID Vaccine Appeal Meets Skeptical 2nd Circ.

    A Second Circuit panel expressed doubt Monday that Yale healthcare workers who resisted the COVID-19 vaccine could blame a private entity for alleged constitutional violations, with one judge saying the appeal is the stuff of pro se filings, and it was "shocking" to see that an attorney had brought it.

  • October 05, 2026

    High Court Won't Review Medical Tape Antitrust Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused Monday to review a case accusing medical supplies group purchasing giant Vizient Inc. of locking in hospital customers, after the lower courts found a medical tape supplier failed to define a market that Vizient allegedly monopolized.

  • October 05, 2026

    9th Circ. Invited To Take A Crack At Feds' Calif. Egg Law Suit

    A California federal judge refused Friday to toss the federal government's challenge to a Golden State law banning the sale of eggs laid by hens raised in "cruel" conditions, but allowed California to file an interlocutory appeal, finding "there is substantial ground for difference of opinion" on the government's standing.

  • October 05, 2026

    High Court Revives Murder-For-Hire Plea Appeal After Hunter

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday vacated a Second Circuit decision dismissing the sentencing appeal of a man who pled guilty to a role in a murder-for-hire plot, telling the circuit court to take another look in light of the high court's new miscarriage-of-justice exception for criminal appeal waivers.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Won't Hear 10th Circ. Tulsa Officer Immunity Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to review a Tenth Circuit decision denying a former Tulsa police officer qualified immunity from a civil suit alleging she used excessive force when she shot and killed an unarmed man.

  • October 05, 2026

    Worker Fired After Flu Vax Rift Can't Get High Court Traction

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused Monday to hear a Black former health system employee's challenge to the dismissal of her suit alleging that racism, as opposed to noncompliance with the company's flu vaccine requirement, got her fired.

  • October 05, 2026

    7th Circ. Rejects Ex-Club Prez's Claim Of Fake Canceled Debt

    The Seventh Circuit upheld the dismissal of a former country club president's claim that the club filed a fraudulent information return with the IRS reporting a canceled debt, saying he failed to make a case for overturning precedent that limited taxpayers' ability to seek damages for fraudulent return filings.

  • October 05, 2026

    Pepperdine Asks 9th Circ. For Another Shot At Netflix TM Suit

    Pepperdine University is urging the Ninth Circuit to revive its trademark suit over the "Waves" team name used in a Netflix sports comedy series starring Kate Hudson, arguing that the district court judge's approach, "would give the entertainment industry carte blanche to infringe trademarks at will."

  • October 05, 2026

    High Court Won't Vacate Habeas Ruling After Case Turns Moot

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to review a Fourth Circuit ruling that blocked a federal prisoner's constitutional challenge to a sentence enhanced under the formerly mandatory federal sentencing guidelines.

  • October 05, 2026

    Mass. Justices Weigh Duties Of DAs, Judges After ICE Arrests

    Justices on Massachusetts' highest court Monday appeared willing to endorse a requirement that prosecutors and judges make formal efforts to get federal immigration officials to bring defendants in their custody to court for pending criminal cases before issuing a default warrant or dismissing a case.

  • October 05, 2026

    Groups Ask DC Circ. To Revive CMS Hemp Program Case

    A coalition of interests challenging a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services program to provide patients access to federally legal hemp products told the D.C. Circuit on Monday that a lower court was wrong to dismiss their petition.

  • October 05, 2026

    1st Circ. Doubts Harvard Grant Fight Belongs In Claims Court

    The First Circuit Monday appeared skeptical that a lower court erred in backing Harvard University in a suit over the Trump administration's bid to freeze more than $2 billion in grant funding, suggesting that the case had been decided in the proper venue.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Won't Review SC Beach Gear Rental Antitrust Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused a petition Monday from a beach equipment rental company seeking to revive its antitrust case accusing a South Carolina city of using its municipal ordinances to monopolize the market.

  • October 05, 2026

    Deported Mass. Student May Be Beyond 1st Circ.'s Reach

    The First Circuit on Monday hinted that it may not have the ability to revive a Massachusetts college student's immigration case because she chose to remain abroad after being deported, meaning she is no longer in federal custody.

  • October 05, 2026

    Fed. Circ. Orders Tossing Indemnity Bid On Different Grounds

    The Federal Circuit on Monday ordered a federal district judge to lift an order dismissing shopping mall owner Simon Property Group's indemnification claim against gift card company Blackhawk Network over a patent infringement case involving methods of executing card payments.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Won't Review Christian Worker's COVID Testing Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court opted Monday not to take up a Christian worker's challenge to a split Eighth Circuit panel decision that nixed her lawsuit alleging a Minnesota county violated her religious rights by requiring her to undergo weekly COVID-19 testing.

  • October 05, 2026

    9th Circ. Pauses Rogoff's Return As Seattle US Atty

    The Ninth Circuit has put on hold a Washington federal judge's decision to reinstate Roger Rogoff as Seattle's top federal prosecutor, a post Rogoff held for less than an hour before he was fired by President Donald Trump.

  • October 05, 2026

    DOJ, Google Want DC Circ. 'Priority' For Search Appeal

    The U.S. Department of Justice and Google jointly asked the D.C. Circuit to prioritize their cross-appeals in the search monopolization case in order to schedule oral arguments as soon as Dec. 9.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Pass On Fatal Drunk-Driving Qualified Immunity Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to review a ruling granting qualified immunity to an Alabama sheriff's deputy who was accused of killing a passenger in a crash while driving drunk and off duty, then fleeing the scene.

  • October 05, 2026

    Justices Want SG's View On 3 Antitrust Cases

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday called for the solicitor general's view in antitrust cases involving hard drive component prices, allergy testing and treatment, and insulin products sold through a drug discount program.

  • October 05, 2026

    NJ Panel Tosses Geofence Warrant, Upending Robbery Case

    A New Jersey appeals court has ruled that police were incorrectly granted a geofence warrant because their application failed to establish a "nexus" between a string of gas station robberies and a potential suspect's cellphone location data.

Expert Analysis

  • Flashpoints In Focus: Employer Risk After Trans Sports Ruling

    Author Photo

    Following the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in West Virginia v. B.P.J. that allowed states to limit trans women's participation in sports, schools must carefully navigate investigations and religious accommodations, as even lawful athletics policies can lead to employment claims, say attorneys at Seyfarth.

  • Inside Differing State Approaches To Prediction Market Taxes

    Author Photo

    As states adopt divergent approaches to prediction market platforms through both legislation and litigation, and the landscape is anything but settled, the emerging patchwork of state taxes on prediction markets presents novel questions about characterization, preemption and compliance, say attorneys at Holland & Knight.

  • After Wash. Ruling, Paid Claim May Not End Bad Faith Risk

    Author Photo

    In Labeaume v. First National Insurance, a Washington appeals court recently held that the insurer's benefit payment did not preclude the plaintiff's Insurance Fair Conduct Act claim, expanding the scope of the act's cure provision and making claim documentation even more significant, says Rishabh Agny at Clyde & Co.

  • Series

    Being A Singer Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Before law school, I spent seven years trying to make it as a professional singer in Los Angeles, and nearly everything I learned about preparation, humility, confidence and more has followed me into my legal practice, says Jessica Caterina at Moses & Singer.

  • Justices' Review Of Atty Fees Could Reshape Pipeline Takings

    Author Photo

    With the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to review Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, property owners' right to recover attorney fees for appropriations under the Natural Gas Act is at stake, potentially leading to a choice between a depressed land valuation or court costs that could exceed any rewards, says attorney Sophia Holley.

  • How 2nd Circ. Raised The Bar For Pleading Securities Fraud

    Author Photo

    In Huey v. Anavex, the Second Circuit recently appeared to increase the burden on securities fraud plaintiffs in pleading loss causation where no immediate share price decline follows the corrective disclosure, generating new questions that district courts must grapple with, say attorneys at Skadden.

  • Trade Secret Practice Tips From The 1st Half Of 2026

    Author Photo

    Intellectual property attorneys should consider what several significant developments in 2026 thus far mean for how they protect, litigate and value trade secrets, focusing on new state noncompete bans, cases scrutinizing how plaintiffs identify trade secrets and federal rulings on damages doctrines, say attorneys at Faegre Drinker.

  • Yellow Corp. WARN Act Appeal Refines Layoff Guidance

    Author Photo

    A Delaware federal court's recent upholding of a bankruptcy court's disallowance of unions' federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act claims against Yellow underscores that fact-specific notices and thoughtful timing are essential for distressed companies implementing layoffs, say attorneys at King & Spalding.

  • High Court Rulings Could Alter Agency Strategy For Cos.

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's recent decisions in Trump v. Slaughter and Trump v. Cook mark major turning points in the law of independent agencies and in how regulated companies should think about federal enforcement, rulemaking and agency-facing strategy, say attorneys at Holtzman Vogel.

  • Opinion

    Justices' Parole Ruling Degrades Green Card Holders' Rights

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Blanche v. Lau, holding that U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers can parole a returning lawful permanent resident without clear and convincing evidence of a crime, weakens the statutory and practical protections Congress intended, say attorneys at Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners.

  • 3rd Circ. ERISA Ruling Stresses Process Over Perfect Returns

    Author Photo

    The Third Circuit's recent decision in Quest Diagnostics affirms that a sound fiduciary process — not perfect investment returns — defeats Employee Retirement Income Security Act claims, signaling that courts will keep scrutinizing how fiduciaries decide, and sponsors who can show their work should remain protected, say attorneys at Nixon Peabody.

  • Fed. Circ. Licensing Rulings Shed Light On Patentee Standing

    Author Photo

    Two recent decisions from the Federal Circuit provide a useful framework for evaluating whether a patent license agreement preserves a sufficient exclusionary interest to support future patent infringement claims, say attorneys at Venable.

  • Asylum Ruling Signals Larger Separation Of Powers Battle

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado that border officials may turn away asylum-seekers without inspection is part of a broader conversation about the reach of institutional safeguards that subject governmental authority to legal constraint, says Dree Collopy at American University's Washington College of Law.

  • Solar's Momentum At Mid-2026 Will Help It Overcome Snags

    Author Photo

    The rapid expansion of U.S. solar development in the first half of 2026 is likely to continue its pace, even amid ongoing shifts in federal trade policy and supply chain regulations, obstacles to permitting reform, and an increasing divide between states enacting policies to encourage or stymie project development, say attorneys at Beveridge & Diamond.

  • How Justices Stayed Off The Geofence In Location Data Case

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court's recent Chatrie v. United States decision reaffirms Fourth Amendment protections for location data but avoids more complicated questions about geofence warrants, say attorneys at Adams Duerk.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Appellate archive.