Appellate

  • October 13, 2026

    Pa. High Court Snapshot: Jail Bargaining, Energy Land Tiffs

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court will consider whether a referendum banning solitary confinement at the Allegheny County Jail had to be bargained with the jail's union when the court sits in Pittsburgh starting Wednesday.

  • October 13, 2026

    11th Circ. Lowers Bar For Getting ERISA Claims Into Court

    The full Eleventh Circuit on Tuesday overturned decades-old precedent that took a strict view of when federal benefits law claims could be brought in court, reviving a proposed class action alleging mismanagement of a seafood company's employee stock ownership plan.

  • October 13, 2026

    Justices Agree To Hear Habeas Case About Circuit Splits

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to consider whether prisoners can appeal denials of their federal habeas corpus petitions if there is a circuit split on the issue underlying their petition, even if their home circuit has precedent against them.

  • October 13, 2026

    High Court Will Not Hear Fiat Chrysler Defect Row

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to weigh whether an arbitrator or a court should decide the proper venue for a dispute involving a nonsignatory to an arbitration agreement in an appeal brought by Fiat Chrysler in a proposed class action over allegedly defective Jeep and Dodge headrests.

  • October 13, 2026

    High Court Sends Back $28M Roundup Verdict After Durnell

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday remanded a case involving a $28 million award to a California man who developed non-Hodgkins lymphoma after using Monsanto's Roundup weed killer, following its recent ruling that federal law barred failure-to-warn claims over the pesticide.

  • October 13, 2026

    High Court Won't Take Up Texas A&M Prof's FMLA Appeal

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused Tuesday to review a Texas A&M University professor's lawsuit alleging she was denied tenure because of pregnancy-related time off, leaving in place a state court's conclusion that the college had immunity from her Family and Medical Leave Act claims.

  • October 13, 2026

    High Court To Consider DOGE FOIA Dispute

    The U.S. Supreme Court announced Tuesday it will review the D.C. Circuit's decision to greenlight limited discovery aimed at determining whether the Department of Government Efficiency is an agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act.

  • October 13, 2026

    Justices Won't Eye 'Weaponized' Sanctions Of Election Attys

    Despite outrage among Ninth Circuit conservatives, the U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to scrutinize six-figure sanctions of lawyers who challenged Arizona election protocols, leaving intact discipline designed to "send a message."

  • October 13, 2026

    High Court Won't Hear NYC Loft-Conversion Petition

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to review a decision from New York's highest court determining that New York City fees for converting artist lofts into residential units are legally enforceable.

  • October 13, 2026

    Supreme Court Won't Weigh Employer-Knowledge OT Defense

    The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Tuesday to review whether an employer owes overtime pay if it did not have knowledge that the worker was putting in the extra hours, avoiding reconsideration of a Fifth Circuit ruling in a wage case against Texas Farm Bureau.

  • October 13, 2026

    Justices Turn Away Ex-Ruby Tuesday Execs' Benefits Case

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected former Ruby Tuesday executives' bid for review of their claims that Regions Bank underpaid them after their deferred compensation benefits were liquidated in bankruptcy, turning away a case the ex-executives said presented a circuit split.

  • October 13, 2026

    Justices Won't Review Ohio's Out-Of-State Wine Sales Law

    The U.S. Supreme Court refused on Tuesday to review a Sixth Circuit ruling that found Ohio's law banning the shipment of wine to consumers in the state by out-of-state retailers is unconstitutional.

  • October 13, 2026

    Justices To Weigh If Cooking For Terrorists Bars Asylum

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will review whether a Nigerian man's short stint as a cook for a terrorist group constituted "material support" that would render the already deported man ineligible for asylum.

  • October 09, 2026

    5th Circ. Judges Clash Over Trans Restroom Photo Case

    A split Fifth Circuit on Friday declined to rehear a preliminary injunction bid in a case challenging the constitutionality of enforcing a Texas privacy law against a plaintiff who tweeted a photo of a trans woman in a bathroom, spurring three judges to author contentious concurring and dissenting opinions.

  • October 09, 2026

    9th Circ. Sides With Forest Service In Idaho Project Suit

    The Ninth Circuit on Friday reversed a lower court's finding that the U.S. Forest Service ran afoul of the National Forest Management Act when it approved an Idaho project, ruling the court erred when analyzing the project's compliance with limits on road construction in areas in and around bear habitat.

  • October 09, 2026

    Calif. Commission Bumps Up 3 Judges To Appellate Posts

    California's Commission on Judicial Appointments voted to elevate three Superior Court judges to state appellate court positions in Los Angeles and Santa Ana, the commission announced Friday.

  • October 09, 2026

    Iberdrola Loses Bid To Revive Mass. Power Plant Fraud Suit

    A New York appellate court has declined to revive an Iberdrola unit's lawsuit accusing the funders of a Massachusetts power plant project of tricking the energy company into largely completing construction before interfering in the contract to avoid funding the work.

  • October 09, 2026

    Texas Homeowners Lose Appeal In Harvey Flood Suit

    A Texas appellate court ruled Friday that the companies behind a housing development had no duty to prevent the catastrophic flooding associated with Hurricane Harvey, handing a defeat to homeowners in a suit that appeared to pose a novel issue given the historic storm.

  • October 09, 2026

    Cities Ask Justices To Undo Texas-DOJ Immigration Rule Deal

    Democracy Forward Foundation and several cities asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday to stay a district court's approval of a deal Texas and the Trump administration struck to vacate a Biden-era rule allowing immigration courts to temporarily close cases.

  • October 09, 2026

    Expert's Failure To Identify Doctors Dooms Texas Med Mal Suit

    A Texas appellate court has tossed a medical malpractice lawsuit accusing three doctors of failing to diagnose a woman's brain cyst, holding that the plaintiff's expert report failed to identify which physicians allegedly caused the woman's injuries.

  • October 09, 2026

    Pot Farm Seeks Review Of 6th Circ. Federal-Illegality Ruling

    A Michigan cannabis farm is asking the Sixth Circuit to reconsider a recent holding that contracts in the federally illegal marijuana industry are unenforceable, saying the ruling would cause "unimaginable instability" in jurisdictions with legalized cannabis.

  • October 09, 2026

    Atty Wrongly Axed CitiMortgage Suit, Clients Tell NC Justices

    A couple asked the North Carolina Supreme Court to revive their lawsuit against CitiMortgage Inc., claiming their attorney permanently dismissed their claims without their permission when they had agreed only to a dismissal that would allow them to refile.

  • October 09, 2026

    Pa. Justices Won't Extend Deadline For 'Skill Games' Removal

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has denied a request from three state lawmakers and a group of "skill games" operators to extend the deadline for businesses to remove devices that the high court recently deemed illegal slot machines.

  • October 09, 2026

    11th Circ. Orders Resentencing Under New Robbery Rule

    The Eleventh Circuit has ruled that a man convicted of robbing two auto parts stores should be resentenced because changes in the federal sentencing guidelines retroactively updated language relating to the physical restraint of a victim.

  • October 09, 2026

    DirecTV, AGs Can't See Nexstar-Tegna Benefits Yet

    A California federal magistrate judge refused to make Nexstar and Tegna explain how their $6.2 billion merger will boost local news against streaming competition and accelerate technological transition, rejecting as premature a motion to compel from DirecTV and the bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general challenging the deal.

Expert Analysis

  • 3 Illinois Updates That Bolster Mortgage Lender Enforcement

    Author Photo

    Illinois lenders can use clarifications from recent legislative and judicial developments — a law defining the limitations period for home equity loans and two rulings on quiet title actions and lien expirations during foreclosures — to sharpen their enforcement tools and better protect their mortgage rights, says Stephanie Mulcahy at Hinshaw.

  • Series

    Mich. Banking Brief: All The Notable Legal Updates In Q3

    Author Photo

    We are at an inflection point for Michigan financial services law, with a state Supreme Court decision recently overruling more than 25 years of precedent on the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, and pending legislation that could significantly shift the regulatory landscape, say attorneys and advisers at Dykema.

  • The Patent Circuit: Marking Duties For Licensed Tech

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's decision in VDPP v. Volkswagen provides clarity on how the patent statute's marking provision applies to licensed technology, but expressly leaves open the question of how exactly patentees can make reasonable efforts to ensure licensees' marking compliance, say attorneys at Knobbe Martens.

  • NY Art Ruling Creates Fault Line In Cultural Property Cases

    Author Photo

    A recent New York state appellate decision, blocking a Holocaust victim’s heirs from using a criminal turnover order to reclaim a work the Art Institute of Chicago says it acquired legally, makes establishing ownership a newly central question in cultural property disputes, says Duncan Levin at Levin & Associates.

  • What Anthropic Security Ruling Means For Gov't Contractors

    Author Photo

    In light of the D.C. Circuit ruling backing the U.S. Department of Defense's decision to remove Anthropic's Claude artificial intelligence models from its supply chain, there are a few steps contractors can take in response, including assessing whether to eliminate use of Anthropic products entirely, say attorneys at Blank Rome.

  • DC Circ. Ruling Highlights Limits Of DOE Grid Orders

    Author Photo

    The D.C. Circuit's recent decision in Michigan v. U.S. Department of Energy, vacating a DOE order to keep a coal-burning power plant open, gives utilities more insight into the durability of federal orders premised on protecting grid security, say attorneys at ArentFox Schiff.

  • Testing AI's Promise For Large-Scale Document Review

    Author Photo

    Our document-review comparison of attorneys' responsiveness and issue coding decisions versus predictions generated by artificial intelligence across 1,600 documents suggests that these tools can offer a reasonable and reliable basis for improved discovery workflows, provided lawyers understand where guardrails are needed, say attorneys at Redgrave.

  • Opinion

    Colo. Climate Suit Defies Limits Of State Power

    Author Photo

    In Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, the U.S. Supreme Court must not allow a single Colorado county to penalize pollution occurring across the country and around the globe, because the U.S. Constitution forbids states from exercising power beyond their borders, says Michael McGinley at Dechert.

  • What's Next For Prediction Markets If States Win At High Court

    Author Photo

    While the Supreme Court hasn't taken up a prediction market case yet, a high court win for the states in their quest to regulate the exchanges would likely mean a wave of state legislature bills and regulatory guidance arriving on different timelines, rather than a single uniform transition, says Howard Herndon at Bradley Arant.

  • 3rd Circ. Ruling Shows ADA Limits Amid Worker Misconduct

    Author Photo

    In Hileman v. West Penn Allegheny Health System, the Third Circuit recently rejected a wrongful termination claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, illustrating that disability and leave laws don't automatically insulate employees from the consequences of prior workplace misconduct, say attorneys at Bond Schoeneck.

  • AI Meeting Recaps Pose New Discovery And Privilege Risks

    Author Photo

    The New York City Bar Association’s recent ethics opinion, cautioning attorneys not to record nonclient conversations with artificial intelligence tools, reflects an emerging view that AI meeting recaps are now a distinct business record category, meaning counsel should set meeting-level controls and apply framework-level updates, says William Wright at Faegre Drinker.

  • Class Actions At The Circuit Courts: September Lessons

    Author Photo

    In this month's review of class action appeals, Mitchell Engel at Shook Hardy discusses six recent rulings involving pecuniary loss in false price comparison advertising, privity in an insurance fee class, antitrust standing, immigration class representatives, retirement beneficiary class commonality, and Rule 23(f) appeals in Fair Labor Standards Act claims.

  • Florida Condo Ruling Offers Tips For Contractor Lien Disputes

    Author Photo

    A recent Florida appellate decision, holding condo owners may challenge liens placed on their units, despite not being party to the underlying disputed agreement their association struck with contractors, offers lessons on lien enforcement to both contractors and condo owners, say attorneys at Adams & Reese.

  • BIA Ruling Could Make Immigration Bond A Catch-22

    Author Photo

    A recent Board of Immigration Appeals decision refining the way immigration judges assess flight risk, when read broadly, could create a circular rule under which a noncitizen can be treated as a flight risk because they have too few ties to the U.S., but also because they have too many, says Georgianna Pisano Goetz at the National Immigrant Justice Center.

  • 8th Circ. Ruling Raises Bar For Seeking Disability Benefits

    Author Photo

    The Eighth Circuit's recent ruling in Post v. Bisignano signals that claimants seeking Social Security disability benefits may need to offer convincing proof of functional restrictions beyond their treating doctors' opinions and illustrates that the court's proclaimant jurisprudence no longer prevails, says Mark DeBofsky at DeBofsky Law.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Appellate archive.