Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Expert Analysis

Interpreting The Stop-Time Rule In Pereira V. Sessions

By Denyse Sabagh, Maxine Bayley and Alison Hopkins ( April 30, 2018, 4:17 PM EDT) -- On April 23, the U. S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments for Pereira v. Sessions, an immigration case that considered the requirements of a notice to appear in removal proceedings in the context of the stop-time rule for cancellation of removal. The issue was whether the language of the statute and a prior Board of Immigration Appeals, or BIA, ruling requires Chevron[1] deference and, if deference is not given, the impact on how the government schedules hearings for removal cases in immigration court. . . .

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Law360 Reveals Titans Of The Plaintiffs Bar

This past year, a handful of attorneys secured billions of dollars in settlements and judgments for both classes and individual plaintiffs against massive companies and organizations like Facebook, Dell, the National Association of Realtors, Johnson & Johnson, UFC and Credit Suisse, earning them recognition as Law360's Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar for 2025.