Navajo Members Say Ariz. Can't Dodge Voting Rights Suit

(September 25, 2020, 7:38 PM EDT) -- Navajo Nation members have accused Arizona's secretary of state of misunderstanding the Voting Rights Act, urging an Arizona federal court not to toss their suit seeking more time to mail in their ballots in the upcoming presidential election.

Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs misconstrued the "fundamental requirements" of the 1965 law when she argued that it's enough for Navajo voters to have ways to cast their ballots on Nov. 3, the tribe members said in opposition papers on Thursday. The real issue is that any one voting option is less accessible to them than other Arizonans, they claimed.

"Every means of voting offered to the one segment of the electorate must be fundamentally and equally available to the entire electorate," the Arizona Navajo voters wrote. "Anything less than that is a violation of Section 2 [of the act] on its face."

In their Aug. 26 complaint, Darlene Yazzie and five other Navajo members living in Arizona asked the court to order the state to accept ballots postmarked by Nov. 3 — the date of the upcoming election — as long as they are received by Nov. 13.

The plaintiffs on Thursday pointed to a U.S. Department of Justice's Voting Rights Act applicability test submitted in the 2016 Nevada voting rights discrimination suit Sanchez et al. v. Cegavske et al.

"Plaintiffs do not need to show that they have no opportunity to vote," the Navajo voters said. "Plaintiffs must only show that they have 'less opportunities' to vote as compared to other voters, in this case in their county and state."

When it comes to mail-in voting, that threshold is clearly met, the Navajo voters said. Navajo voters in Arizona have few post offices, they said, and those that exist have reduced hours of service. The majority of Navajo voters in Arizona do not get at-home mail delivery.

According to the complaint, these and other factors mean tribal members could have as much as 10 fewer days to submit their votes by mail compared to non-Indian voters in "affluent areas," such as Scottsdale.

Counsel for the parties did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In her Sept. 16 motion to dismiss, Hobbs said that the Navajo plaintiffs "do not explain why it is not possible for them to return their completed ballots in time to meet the existing deadline, given the expansive time frame that state law affords voters to vote by mail."

Hobbs also listed alternative voting options available to Navajo voters in Arizona, including in-person voting on and before Election Day.

"The existence of alternative voting means or accessibility does not otherwise absolve the defendant of the requirement to make all 'opportunities' available," the Navajo voters countered on Thursday.

The Trump reelection campaign and the Republican National Committee sought to intervene in the suit earlier this month, but the court rejected their bid, according to their counsel. 

The Navajo Nation members are represented by Chris McClure and by Michael J. Novotny of Big Fire Law & Policy Group LLP.

Hobbs is represented by David Andrew Gaona, Kristen Michelle Yost and Roopali H. Desai of Coppersmith Brockelman PLC and Marty Harper of ASU Alumni Law Group.

The Trump campaign, the RNC and the other proposed intervenors are represented by Brett W. Johnson, Eric H. Spencer, Colin P. Ahler and Derek C. Flint of Snell & Wilmer LLP.

The case is Yazzie et al. v. Hobbs, case number 3:20-cv-08222, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.

--Additional reporting by Andrew Westney. Editing by Nicole Bleier.

For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com.

Useful Tools & Links

Related Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Yazzie et al v. Hobbs


Case Number

3:20-cv-08222

Court

Arizona

Nature of Suit

Civil Rights: Voting

Judge

G Murray Snow

Date Filed

August 26, 2020

Law Firms

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!