Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Expert Analysis

A Viable Theory Of Sham Infringement Litigation?

Law360 ( April 13, 2010, 11:41 AM EDT) -- A sham infringement litigation claim involves an assertion of actual or attempted monopolization under Section 2 of the Sherman Act predicated on the alleged meritless enforcement of a patent. For patent infringement litigation to be a sham, it must be objectively baseless and have been brought with the subjective intent of interfering directly with a competitor's business relationships by using the judicial process as an anti-competitive weapon....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Companies

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!