Case Study: GloNav V. NXP

Law360, New York ( November 14, 2011, 3:24 PM EST) -- Frequently, buyers and sellers end up litigating the earn-out provisions in their merger agreements. In a recent memorandum opinion, GloNav Inc. , et. al v. NXP B. V. , Civ. A. No. 5110 VCG (Del. Ch. , Nov. 4, 2011), the Delaware Chancery Court applied the step transaction doctrine in deciding that a subsequent joint venture (JV) transaction involving NXP (Buyer) triggered its obligation to make certain contingent (earn-out) payments under its merger agreement (MA) with GloNav (Seller). . . .

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Law firms are actively looking for ways to incorporate artificial intelligence into their workflow as it becomes ever more common. More than half of surveyed attorneys at U.S. law firms use generative AI for some purpose — up significantly from less than a third of attorneys who participated in the Law360 Pulse AI Survey last year.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!