Fed. Circ. Ruling Provides Guidance On 'Reason To Combine'

Law360, New York ( November 1, 2013, 1:01 PM EDT) -- In KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court established a new standard for obviousness law in the United States. In an attempt to provide clarity, the court established several guidelines. While rejecting the Federal Circuit's rigid application of the teaching, suggestion or motivation test (TSM test), the court advocated a flexible application of this test. Accordingly, there must be a "sufficient reason" for a skilled artisan to modify prior art references to arrive at the claimed invention at issue. The court also noted that "conclusory reasoning" is not sufficient; rather "sufficient reasoning with rational underpinning" is necessary....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!