Merle Norman Retaliation Plaintiff Owed Benefits, Court Says

By Jeff Sistrunk ( February 12, 2014, 7:07 PM EST) -- A California appeals court on Monday ruled that Merle Norman Cosmetics Inc. must pay unemployment benefits to a former employee who claims she was fired in retaliation for reporting alleged sexual harassment, finding that the employee did not technically quit her job by making requests about work conditions that the company found unreasonable....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.

A Law360 subscription includes features such as