Key E-Discovery Considerations In Patent Litigation
Law360, New York ( March 17, 2014, 12:23 PM EDT) -- Patent litigation is expensive. A significant portion of this expense is due to the time and effort required to search, review, and produce large amounts of electronically stored information during discovery. In recent years, federal courts have attempted to reduce the burden of e-discovery in patent litigation by adopting model orders that phase discovery and require parties to focus the issues before serving email production requests. Patent disputes are often narrow and turn on discrete issues that do not require broad-based e-discovery. Incorporating the model orders' discovery-tailoring features into a litigant's strategy for early-stage Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) discovery conference can help reduce the costs and burdens of patent litigation. . . .
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
Law firms are actively looking for ways to incorporate artificial intelligence into their workflow as it becomes ever more common. More than half of surveyed attorneys at U.S. law firms use generative AI for some purpose — up significantly from less than a third of attorneys who participated in the Law360 Pulse AI Survey last year.
