Behind The Court's Decision In Merrill Lynch V. Dabit
By Catherine Fredenburgh ( March 30, 2006, 12:00 AM EST) -- In an 8-0 decision, the United States Supreme Court held on March 21, 2006 that the Securities Litigation Uniform Securities Act of 1998 ("SLUSA") pre-empts state law securities fraud class actions even where federal law provides no private remedy. The Court's decision in Merrill Lynch v. Dabit, No. 04-1371, likely represents the death knell for "holder class actions"—claims brought on behalf of classes of investors alleging that they were defrauded into holding shares they had previously purchased. For decades, holders have been barred from bringing Rule 10b-5 cases in federal court by a well-settled rule limiting standing to those who actually purchased or sold a security in reliance on the alleged fraud. The effect of the Dabit ruling is that in most cases, the class action device will be unavailable to holders alleging state law claims as well....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.