Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Expert Analysis

5 Lessons From Clorox Antitrust Case

Law360, New York ( March 12, 2015, 10:00 AM EDT) -- On Feb. 2, 2015, a federal district court broke new ground by becoming the first court to allow a claim under Sections 2(d) and 2(e) of the Robinson-Patman Act for discriminating between customers with respect to package size.[1] The court denied a motion by Clorox to dismiss a complaint against it filed by Woodman's Food Market, a regional chain of 15 grocery stores, alleging that Clorox violated Sections 2(d) and 2(e) by refusing to sell Woodman's the same large packs of products that Clorox sold to certain "big box" stores.[2]...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!